Data as of .
FTQI vs OMAH: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against FTQI’s 12.0%, though FTQI returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: FTQI scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTQI and OMAH hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FTQI | OMAH |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc. | 8.76% | 10.59% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) | 2.06% | 4.57% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class C) | 2.05% | 4.54% |
| VeriSign, Inc. | 0.57% | 4.90% |
| The Coca-Cola Company | 0.22% | 4.94% |
| American Express Company | 0.19% | 6.57% |
| Chevron Corporation | 0.12% | 4.75% |
| Only in FTQI | Only in OMAH |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corporation 6.55% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% |
| US Dollar 5.75% | Kroger Co/The 4.79% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 5.41% | DAVITA INC 4.75% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 4.13% | Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 3.18% | Chubb Ltd 4.49% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 2.75% | Kraft Heinz Co/The 4.46% |
| Tesla, Inc. 2.68% | Moody's Corp 4.42% |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. (Class A) 2.54% | Sirius XM Holdings Inc 4.29% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTQI | OMAH | FTQI | OMAH | FTQI | OMAH | |
| 3 months | +4.0% | +1.7% | 2.9% | 3.7% | +6.5 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 6 months | +18.3% | +8.8% | 6.3% | 7.7% | −5.9 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 1 year | +21.5% | +8.8% | 12.0% | 14.4% | −0.3 pts | +4.9 pts |
| 3 years | +62.9% | not published | 37.0% | not published | −35.3 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +141.7% | +14.6% | 78.8% | 21.4% | −675.0 pts | +12.4 pts |
| FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | VistaShares |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 11.9% | 15.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 12.0% | 14.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +8.0% | −6.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.5% | +8.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +3.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −0.3 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 4637 days | 562 days |
| Net assets | $975m | $1.1bn |
FTQI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FTQI paid 12.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +21.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 11.9%, paid monthly.
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, FTQI or OMAH?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, FTQI paid 12.0% of its starting price in cash and OMAH paid 14.4%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, FTQI or OMAH?
- With every distribution reinvested, FTQI returned +21.5% and OMAH returned +8.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so FTQI returned more.
- Which is cheaper, FTQI or OMAH?
- FTQI charges 0.75% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so FTQI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FTQI against OMAH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ftqi-vs-omah Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.