Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

FTQI vs PBP: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FTQI paid 12.1% of its price in cash against PBP’s 11.7% and the two finished level on total return.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FTQI and PBP

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $997m for First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF and $389m for Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF.

At a glance
12.1%
FTQI cash paid, 1 year
11.7%
PBP cash paid, 1 year
+16.5%
FTQI total return, 1 year
+16.2%
PBP total return, 1 year
FTQI · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 4.2 pts ahead of QQQ
FTQI
+16.5%
QQQ
+12.3%

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

FTQI over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price +3.5%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

FTQI

+16.5%

12.1% of it arrived as cash

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

FTQI over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price +3.5%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

QQQ

+12.3%

FTQI

+16.5%

12.1% as cash

4.2 pts ahead of QQQ

12.1% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. FTQI over 1 year: paid 12.1%, price +3.5%, total +16.5%, QQQ +12.3%, +4.2 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
PBP · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.4 pts ahead of SPY
PBP
+16.2%
SPY
+14.8%

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

PBP over 1 year: paid 11.7%, price +3.6%, total +16.2%, SPY +14.8%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

PBP

+16.2%

11.7% of it arrived as cash

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

PBP over 1 year: paid 11.7%, price +3.6%, total +16.2%, SPY +14.8%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

PBP

+16.2%

11.7% as cash

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

11.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +16.5%. PBP over 1 year: paid 11.7%, price +3.6%, total +16.2%, SPY +14.8%, +1.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Both charts share one scale, 0 to +16.5%. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

PBP costs 0.46 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; FTQI is 2.6 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FTQI vs PBP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureFTQIPBP
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+16.5%+16.2%
Price change, 1 yearrose 3.5%rose 3.6%
Return of capital, issuer estimate99% of the Oct 30, 2026 payment95% of the Oct 23, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkNasdaq-100, measured through QQQS&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.75%0.29%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$997m$389m
Holdings
Holdings in common43%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · PBP scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score74FTQI75.1PBP

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

Risk and return

Jan 17, 2014 to Oct 30, 2026 · 667 weekly returns
FTQI PBP
Return
Total return edge FTQI (slight) +139.5% +132.1%
Annualized edge FTQI (slight) +7.0% +6.8%
Price return edge PBP +8.0% +10.8%
Risk
Volatility edge PBP (slight) 11.8% 11.0%
Max drawdown edge FTQI −18.5% −29.3%
Downside capture 58.3% 66.8%
Beta 0.45 0.63
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge Tie 0.47 0.47
Sortino edge FTQI (slight) 0.66 0.60
Treynor 0.123 0.072
Calmar edge FTQI 0.38 0.23
Against the benchmark
Alpha −2.0% a year −2.2% a year
Alpha t-stat −0.90 −1.56
Information ratio −0.84 −0.68
Tracking error 13.4% 9.1%

Each against its own benchmark: FTQI against QQQ, Jan 17, 2014 to Oct 30, 2026; PBP against SPY, Dec 28, 2007 to Oct 30, 2026.

Reading

From Jan 2014 to Oct 2026, FTQI returned slightly more: +139.5% to +132.1%. PBP swung slightly less: 11.0% to 11.8%. FTQI fell less at its worst: −18.5% to −29.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FTQI vs PBP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureFTQIPBPEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+139.5%+132.1%FTQI (slight)Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+7.0%+6.8%FTQI (slight)Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return+8.0%+10.8%PBPPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility11.8%11.0%PBP (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation8.4%8.7%FTQI (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.5%−29.3%FTQIDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture31.2%43.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture58.3%66.8%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.450.63Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.550.78Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.470.47TieReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.660.60FTQI (slight)Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1230.072Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.380.23FTQIAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkQQQSPYThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha−2.0% a year−2.2% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat−0.90−1.56Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−6.4% to +2.4%−5.0% to +0.6%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio−0.84−0.68Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error13.4%9.1%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 667 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

43%

By the books each fund has filed, FTQI and PBP hold 43% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

43% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FTQI PBP
Apple Inc. 8.98% 7.47%
NVIDIA Corporation 6.22% 7.71%
Amazon.com, Inc. 4.23% 3.79%
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 2.67% 2.11%
Tesla, Inc. 3.05% 1.73%
Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 1.72% 2.53%
Alphabet Inc. (Class C) 1.72% 2.04%
Broadcom Inc. 1.64% 2.44%
Microsoft Corporation 1.55% 5.96%
Micron Technology, Inc. 2.01% 1.49%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.73% 1.22%
AbbVie Inc. 1.48% 0.78%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FTQI
Medpace Holdings, Inc. 0.86%
Woodward, Inc. 0.81%
DocuSign, Inc. 0.70%
Texas Roadhouse, Inc. 0.66%
Guardant Health, Inc. 0.65%
InterDigital, Inc. 0.53%
Qualys, Inc. 0.49%
Royalty Pharma Plc (Class A) 0.49%
Only in PBP
Eli Lilly & Co 1.74%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.60%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.39%
Visa Inc 1.10%
Walmart Inc 0.86%
Mastercard Inc 0.81%
Procter & Gamble Co 0.58%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 0.56%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

FTQI First Trust Nasdaq BuyWrite Income ETF · Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly PBP Invesco S&P 500 BuyWrite ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
Strategy covered call covered call
Benchmark Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 12.3% 8.5%
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.29%
Cash paid, 1 year 12.1% 11.7%
Price change, 1 year +3.5% +3.6%
Total return, 1 year +16.5% +16.2%
Benchmark return, 1 year +12.3% +14.8%
Ahead or behind +4.2 pts +1.4 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 99% 95%
Age 12.8 years 18.9 years
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $997m $389m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: FTQI vs PBP: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowFTQIPBPFTQIPBPFTQIPBP
3 months+0.4%+2.5%3.0%2.5%+3.8 pts+2.6 pts
6 months+6.6%+8.1%6.0%5.3%+6.9 pts+3.1 pts
1 year+16.5%+16.2%12.1%11.7%+4.3 pts+1.4 pts
3 years+60.8%+49.6%38.1%33.4%−30.5 pts−33.3 pts
Since launchNot the same days: FTQI Jan 2014 · PBP Dec 2007+138.8%+172.0%81.1%92.4%−641.3 pts−467.6 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Client brief:

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FTQI and PBP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FTQI

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FTQI paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +12.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.2 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.3%, paid monthly. First Trust estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Oct 30, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

PBP

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, PBP paid 11.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 3.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +16.2%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly. Invesco estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Oct 23, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, FTQI or PBP?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, FTQI paid 12.1% of its starting price in cash and PBP paid 11.7%, so FTQI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, FTQI or PBP?
With every distribution reinvested, FTQI returned +16.5% and PBP +16.2% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, FTQI or PBP?
FTQI charges 0.75% a year and PBP charges 0.29%, so PBP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FTQI against PBP, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ftqi-vs-pbp

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.