Data as of .
OMAH vs XQQI: which paid, and which earned it?
OMAH and XQQI both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OMAH and XQQI hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | OMAH | XQQI |
|---|---|---|
| Apple Inc | 10.59% | 7.25% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.57% | 3.50% |
| Alphabet Inc | 4.54% | 3.24% |
| Kraft Heinz Co/The | 4.46% | 0.11% |
| Only in OMAH | Only in XQQI |
|---|---|
| Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% | NVIDIA Corp 8.26% |
| American Express Co 6.57% | Micron Technology Inc 5.94% |
| Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94% | Microsoft Corp 4.72% |
| VeriSign Inc 4.90% | Amazon.com Inc 4.37% |
| Kroger Co/The 4.79% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.36% |
| Chevron Corp 4.75% | Tesla Inc 3.55% |
| DAVITA INC 4.75% | Intel Corp 3.27% |
| Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% | Broadcom Inc 2.99% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OMAH | XQQI | OMAH | XQQI | OMAH | XQQI | |
| 3 months | +1.7% | −2.7% | 3.7% | 4.8% | −2.4 pts | −0.2 pts |
| 6 months | +8.8% | +21.8% | 7.7% | 11.4% | +2.8 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 1 year | +8.8% | not published | 14.4% | not published | +4.9 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +14.6% | +14.3% | 21.4% | 13.7% | +12.4 pts | −2.9 pts |
| OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | XQQI NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF Option income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | VistaShares | NEOS |
| Strategy | covered call | option income |
| Benchmark | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 15.1% | 20.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.98% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 14.4% | 13.7% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −6.3% | −0.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +8.8% | +14.3% (since launch on Feb 3, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +3.9% | +17.3% |
| Ahead or behind | +4.9 pts | −2.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 100% |
| Age | 562 days | 227 days |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $351m |
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
XQQI in plain words
Over the period since launch on Feb 3, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, XQQI paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.3%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +17.3% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 20.5%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Jul 10, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, OMAH or XQQI?
- OMAH charges 0.98% a year and XQQI charges 0.98%, so OMAH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, OMAH against XQQI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/omah-vs-xqqi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.