Data as of .
JEPQ vs OMAH: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year OMAH paid 14.4% of its price in cash against JEPQ’s 11.9%, though JEPQ returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: OMAH scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JEPQ and OMAH hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | JEPQ | OMAH |
|---|---|---|
| Apple, Inc. | 5.83% | 10.59% |
| Alphabet, Inc. | 5.05% | 4.54% |
| Coca-Cola Co. (The) | 0.18% | 4.94% |
| Kraft Heinz Co. (The) | 0.09% | 4.46% |
| Only in JEPQ | Only in OMAH |
|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp. 6.68% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. 5.58% | American Express Co 6.57% |
| Microsoft Corp. 3.90% | VeriSign Inc 4.90% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 3.87% | Kroger Co/The 4.79% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. 3.67% | Chevron Corp 4.75% |
| Lam Research Corp. 2.89% | DAVITA INC 4.75% |
| Tesla, Inc. 2.39% | Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% |
| Meta Platforms, Inc. 2.38% | Alphabet Inc 4.57% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JEPQ | OMAH | JEPQ | OMAH | JEPQ | OMAH | |
| 3 months | +1.6% | +1.7% | 3.3% | 3.7% | +4.1 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 6 months | +15.1% | +8.8% | 6.7% | 7.7% | −9.2 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 1 year | +18.5% | +8.8% | 11.9% | 14.4% | −3.2 pts | +4.9 pts |
| 3 years | +73.0% | not published | 37.2% | not published | −25.1 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +91.7% | +14.6% | 49.2% | 21.4% | −33.0 pts | +12.4 pts |
| JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF Covered call on QQQ, paying monthly | OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | JPMorgan | VistaShares |
| Strategy | covered call | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 13.6% | 15.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 11.9% | 14.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | +5.7% | −6.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +18.5% | +8.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +21.8% | +3.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −3.2 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1598 days | 562 days |
| Net assets | $43.0bn | $1.1bn |
JEPQ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JEPQ paid 11.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 5.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +18.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 13.6%, paid monthly.
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, JEPQ or OMAH?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JEPQ paid 11.9% of its starting price in cash and OMAH paid 14.4%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, JEPQ or OMAH?
- With every distribution reinvested, JEPQ returned +18.5% and OMAH returned +8.8% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so JEPQ returned more.
- Which is cheaper, JEPQ or OMAH?
- JEPQ charges 0.35% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so JEPQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, JEPQ against OMAH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/jepq-vs-omah Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.