Data as of .
KIQQ vs OMAH: which paid, and which earned it?
KIQQ and OMAH both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KIQQ and OMAH hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | KIQQ | OMAH |
|---|---|---|
| APPLE INC | 8.20% | 10.59% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A | 3.40% | 4.57% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL C | 3.15% | 4.54% |
| Only in KIQQ | Only in OMAH |
|---|---|
| +NDXDBHIO/-FED FUNDS 100.58% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.22% |
| NVIDIA CORP 8.90% | American Express Co 6.57% |
| MICROSOFT CORP 6.17% | Coca-Cola Co/The 4.94% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.14% | VeriSign Inc 4.90% |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.50% | Kroger Co/The 4.79% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.21% | Chevron Corp 4.75% |
| META PLATFORMS INC 3.31% | DAVITA INC 4.75% |
| TESLA INC 3.19% | Occidental Petroleum Corp 4.64% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIQQ | OMAH | KIQQ | OMAH | KIQQ | OMAH | |
| 3 months | −3.2% | +1.7% | 1.9% | 3.7% | −0.7 pts | −2.4 pts |
| 6 months | +11.9% | +8.8% | 4.5% | 7.7% | −12.3 pts | +2.8 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +8.8% | not published | 14.4% | not published | +4.9 pts |
| Since launch | +6.0% | +14.6% | 5.8% | 21.4% | −9.9 pts | +12.4 pts |
| KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF Buffer with income on QQQ, paying monthly | OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF Covered call on BRK-B, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | KraneShares | VistaShares |
| Strategy | buffer with income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.3% | 15.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.98% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 5.8% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) | 14.4% |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.1% | −6.3% |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.0% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) | +8.8% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +15.9% | +3.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −9.9 pts | +4.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 254 days | 562 days |
| Net assets | $3m | $1.1bn |
KIQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jan 7, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, KIQQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly.
OMAH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, OMAH paid 14.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 6.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.8%. Berkshire Hathaway B (BRK-B), used as the proxy returned +3.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 4.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.1%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, KIQQ or OMAH?
- KIQQ charges 0.79% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so KIQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KIQQ against OMAH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kiqq-vs-omah Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.