Data as of .
KIQQ vs ROCY: which paid, and which earned it?
KIQQ and ROCY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, KIQQ and ROCY hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | KIQQ | ROCY |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORP | 8.90% | 8.37% |
| APPLE INC | 8.20% | 6.71% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 6.17% | 4.97% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 4.50% | 4.15% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 5.14% | 3.00% |
| BROADCOM INC | 2.76% | 2.61% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 3.31% | 2.43% |
| LAM RESEARCH CORP | 1.58% | 1.76% |
| TESLA INC | 3.19% | 1.55% |
| ANALOG DEVICES INC | 0.82% | 0.66% |
| PEPSICO INC | 0.84% | 0.46% |
| INTEL CORP | 2.66% | 0.43% |
| Only in KIQQ | Only in ROCY |
|---|---|
| +NDXDBHIO/-FED FUNDS 100.58% | Alphabet, Inc. 5.33% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.21% | Wells Fargo & Co. 2.15% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.40% | Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 1.69% |
| ALPHABET INC-CL C 3.15% | Exxon Mobil Corp. 1.63% |
| SPACE EXPLORATION TECHN-CL A 3.07% | Mastercard, Inc. 1.57% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.00% | Eli Lilly & Co. 1.47% |
| PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A 1.90% | AbbVie, Inc. 1.46% |
| APPLIED MATERIALS INC 1.56% | Seagate Technology Holdings plc 1.38% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KIQQ | ROCY | KIQQ | ROCY | KIQQ | ROCY | |
| 3 months | −3.2% | +2.6% | 1.9% | 1.7% | −0.7 pts | +0.3 pts |
| 6 months | +11.9% | +14.8% | 4.5% | 3.7% | −12.3 pts | −3.3 pts |
| Since launch | +6.0% | +13.5% | 5.8% | 3.6% | −9.9 pts | −2.9 pts |
| KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF Buffer with income on QQQ, paying monthly | ROCY JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | KraneShares | JPMorgan |
| Strategy | buffer with income | covered call |
| Benchmark | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 6.3% | 5.7% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.35% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 5.8% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) | 3.6% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.1% | +9.7% |
| Total return, 1 year | +6.0% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) | +13.5% (since launch on Mar 19, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +15.9% | +16.4% |
| Ahead or behind | −9.9 pts | −2.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 254 days | 183 days |
| Net assets | $3m | $726m |
KIQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jan 7, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, KIQQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly.
ROCY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Mar 19, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ROCY paid 3.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 9.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.4% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.7%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, KIQQ or ROCY?
- KIQQ charges 0.79% a year and ROCY charges 0.35%, so ROCY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, KIQQ against ROCY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/kiqq-vs-rocy Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.