Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACSP vs ODTE: which paid, and which earned it?

ACSP and ODTE both write options for income.

ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF and VegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETF.

0.0%ACSP cash paid, 1 year
6.7%ODTE cash paid, 1 year
−3.8%ACSP total return, 1 year
+6.2%ODTE total return, 1 year
ACSP2.1 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY−1.6%ACSP−3.8%2.1 pts behind SPY
ODTE10.5 pts behind SPY · since launch to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.7%ODTE+6.2%6.7% of it arrived as cash10.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.7%ODTE+6.2%10.5 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and ODTE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ACSPOnly in ODTE
S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%Invesco Nasdaq 100 ETF 33.70%
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF 33.27%
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF 33.03%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACSP and ODTE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACSPODTEACSPODTEACSPODTE
3 monthsnot published−4.8%not published3.4%not published−7.0 pts
Since launch−3.8%+6.2%0.0%6.7%−2.1 pts−10.5 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACSP and ODTE on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACSP
ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF
Option income on SPY
ODTE
VegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying weekly
IssuerProSharesVegaShares
Strategyoption incomecovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy
Paysnot establishedweekly
Payout rate, annualizednot published14.1%
Expense ratio0.72%0.68%
Cash paid, 1 year0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)6.7% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026)
Price change, 1 year−3.8%−0.3%
Total return, 1 year−3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)+6.2% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year−1.6%+16.7%
Ahead or behind−2.1 pts−10.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age35 days169 days
Net assets$27m$3m

ACSP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.

ODTE in plain words

Over the period since launch on Apr 2, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ODTE paid 6.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.2%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.1%, paid weekly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACSP or ODTE?
ACSP charges 0.72% a year and ODTE charges 0.68%, so ODTE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACSP against ODTE, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against ODTE, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-odte Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources