Which is cheaper, ACBH or ACYQ?

ACBH charges 0.60% a year and ACYQ charges 0.75%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

ACBH vs ACYQ: which paid, and which earned it?

ACBH and ACYQ both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF.

0.8%

ACBH cash paid, since launch

1.9%

ACYQ cash paid, since launch

+1.3%

ACBH total return, since launch

+8.0%

ACYQ total return, since launch

ACBH · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY

ACBH

+1.3%

SPY

+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

0.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

ACYQ · since launch to Sep 30, 20263.7 pts ahead of SPY

ACYQ

+8.0%

SPY

+4.3%

3.7 pts ahead of SPY

ACYQ since launch: paid 1.9%, price +6.0%, total +8.0%, SPY +4.3%, +3.7 pts.

SPY

+4.3%

ACYQ

+8.0%

1.9% as cash

3.7 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.7 pts ahead of SPY

ACYQ since launch: paid 1.9%, price +6.0%, total +8.0%, SPY +4.3%, +3.7 pts.

SPY

+4.3%

ACYQ

+8.0%

3.7 pts ahead of SPY

1.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +8.0%. ACYQ since launch: paid 1.9%, price +6.0%, total +8.0%, SPY +4.3%, +3.7 pts.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ACBH	ACYQ	ACBH	ACYQ	ACBH	ACYQ
3 months	not published	+6.0%	not published	1.8%	not published	+3.5 pts
Since launch ACBH Sep 2026 · ACYQ Jun 2026	+1.3%	+8.0%	0.8%	1.9%	+0.4 pts	+3.7 pts

ACBH and ACYQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACBH

Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY

ACYQ

FT Vest Autocallable Barrier & High Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY

Issuer Pacer First Trust

Strategy autocallable autocallable

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy

Pays not established not established

Payout rate, annualized 10.1% 21.0%

Expense ratio 0.60% 0.75%

Cash paid, 1 year 0.8% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 1.9% (since launch on Jun 24, 2026)

Price change, 1 year +0.4% +6.0%

Total return, 1 year +1.3% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) +8.0% (since launch on Jun 24, 2026)

Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% +4.3%

Ahead or behind +0.4 pts +3.7 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 20 days 98 days

Net assets $3m $78m

ACBH and ACYQ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACBH in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.

ACYQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Jun 24, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACYQ paid 1.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 6.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +8.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +4.3% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 3.7 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 21.0%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBH or ACYQ?: ACBH charges 0.60% a year and ACYQ charges 0.75%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ACBH vs DACL ACBH vs IACL ACBH vs JANH ACBH vs JANJ ACYQ vs CAIQ ACYQ vs JANH ACYQ vs JANJ ACYQ vs JANQ

S&P 500 (SPY) →ACBH on its own →ACYQ on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ACBH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACBH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Pacer website ↗ACYQ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACYQ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗First Trust page for ACYQ ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACBH against ACYQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-acyq

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.