ACBH vs ACSP: which paid, and which earned it?
ACBH and ACSP both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF.
About even with SPY
ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.
SPY
+0.9%
ACBH
+1.3%
0.8% as cash
about even with SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with SPY
ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.
SPY
+0.9%
ACBH
+1.3%
about even with SPY
0.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.
2.4 pts behind SPY
ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
SPY
−1.5%
ACSP
−3.9%
2.4 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
2.4 pts behind SPY
ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
SPY
−1.5%
ACSP
−3.9%
2.4 pts behind SPY
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +1.3%. ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACBH | ACSP | ACBH | ACSP | ACBH | ACSP |
| Since launch ACBH Sep 2026 · ACSP Aug 2026 | +1.3% | −3.9% | 0.8% | 0.0% | +0.4 pts | −2.4 pts |
ACBH and ACSP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACBH and ACSP on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACBH in plain words
Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.4 pts.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACBH against ACSP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-acsp
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACBH against ACSP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-acsp Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACBH against ACSP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-acsp
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACBH against ACSP. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-acsp
- Markdown
- [ACBH against ACSP (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-acsp)