Which is cheaper, ACBH or CAGE?

ACBH charges 0.60% a year and CAGE charges 0.74%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

ACBH vs CAGE: which paid, and which earned it?

ACBH and CAGE both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF.

0.8%

ACBH cash paid, since launch

0.0%

CAGE cash paid, since launch

+1.3%

ACBH total return, since launch

+14.4%

CAGE total return, since launch

ACBH · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY

ACBH

+1.3%

SPY

+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

0.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

CAGE · since launch to Sep 30, 20265.2 pts ahead of SPY

CAGE

+14.4%

SPY

+9.2%

5.2 pts ahead of SPY

CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.

SPY

+9.2%

CAGE

+14.4%

5.2 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

5.2 pts ahead of SPY

CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.

SPY

+9.2%

CAGE

+14.4%

5.2 pts ahead of SPY

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.4%. CAGE since launch: paid 0.0%, price +14.4%, total +14.4%, SPY +9.2%, +5.2 pts.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ACBH	CAGE	ACBH	CAGE	ACBH	CAGE
3 months	not published	+3.7%	not published	0.0%	not published	+1.1 pts
Since launch ACBH Sep 2026 · CAGE Apr 2026	+1.3%	+14.4%	0.8%	0.0%	+0.4 pts	+5.2 pts

ACBH and CAGE over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACBH

Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY

CAGE

Calamos Autocallable Growth ETF · Autocallable on SPY

Issuer Pacer Calamos

Strategy autocallable autocallable

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy

Pays not established not established

Payout rate, annualized 10.1% not published

Expense ratio 0.60% 0.74%

Cash paid, 1 year 0.8% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Apr 16, 2026)

Price change, 1 year +0.4% +14.4%

Total return, 1 year +1.3% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) +14.4% (since launch on Apr 16, 2026)

Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% +9.2%

Ahead or behind +0.4 pts +5.2 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 20 days 167 days

Net assets $3m $14m

ACBH and CAGE on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACBH in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.

CAGE in plain words

Over the period since launch on Apr 16, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, CAGE paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 14.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +9.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 5.2 pts.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBH or CAGE?: ACBH charges 0.60% a year and CAGE charges 0.74%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ACBH vs ATCL ACBH vs JANJ ACBH vs JANQ ACBH vs JULH CAGE vs CAIE CAGE vs CAIQ CAGE vs DACL CAGE vs IACL

S&P 500 (SPY) →ACBH on its own →CAGE on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ACBH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACBH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Pacer website ↗CAGE filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CAGE prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Calamos website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACBH against CAGE, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-cage

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.