Which paid more, ACBH or JANQ?

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting price in cash and JANQ paid 0.0%, so ACBH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.

Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACBH or JANQ?

With every distribution reinvested, ACBH returned +1.3% and JANQ 0.0% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.

Which is cheaper, ACBH or JANQ?

ACBH charges 0.60% a year and JANQ charges 0.79%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

ACBH vs JANQ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the window both share ACBH paid 0.8% of its price in cash against JANQ’s 0.0%, and returned more with it reinvested. Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - January.

0.8%

ACBH cash paid, since launch

0.0%

JANQ cash paid, since launch

+1.3%

ACBH total return, since launch

0.0%

JANQ total return, since launch

ACBH · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY

ACBH

+1.3%

SPY

+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

0.8% of it arrived as cash

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

0.8% cash

about even with SPY

0.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

JANQ · since launch to Sep 30, 20260.9 pts behind SPY

JANQ

0.0%

SPY

+0.9%

0.9 pts behind SPY

JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

JANQ

0.0%

0.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.9 pts behind SPY

JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

JANQ

0.0%

0.9 pts behind SPY

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +1.3%. JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ACBH	JANQ	ACBH	JANQ	ACBH	JANQ
Since launch ACBH Sep 2026 · JANQ Sep 2026	+1.3%	0.0%	0.8%	0.0%	+0.4 pts	−0.9 pts

ACBH and JANQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACBH

Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY

JANQ

Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - January · Defined income on SPY

Issuer Pacer Innovator

Strategy autocallable defined income

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays not established not established

Payout rate, annualized 10.1% not published

Expense ratio 0.60% 0.79%

Cash paid, 1 year 0.8% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)

Price change, 1 year +0.4% 0.0%

Total return, 1 year +1.3% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)

Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% +0.9%

Ahead or behind +0.4 pts −0.9 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 20 days 20 days

Net assets $3m not published

ACBH and JANQ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACBH in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.

JANQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, JANQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned 0.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ACBH or JANQ?: Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting price in cash and JANQ paid 0.0%, so ACBH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACBH or JANQ?: With every distribution reinvested, ACBH returned +1.3% and JANQ 0.0% over the year to Sep 30, 2026.
Which is cheaper, ACBH or JANQ?: ACBH charges 0.60% a year and JANQ charges 0.79%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ACBH vs ATCL ACBH vs CAGE ACBH vs CAIE ACBH vs CAIQ JANQ vs AHD JANQ vs APRH JANQ vs APRJ JANQ vs ATC

S&P 500 (SPY) →ACBH on its own →JANQ on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ACBH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACBH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Pacer website ↗JANQ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗JANQ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Innovator website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACBH against JANQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-janq

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.