ACBH vs CAIQ: which paid, and which earned it?
ACBH and CAIQ both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF.
About even with SPY
ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.
SPY
+0.9%
ACBH
+1.3%
about even with SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with SPY
ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.
SPY
+0.9%
ACBH
+1.3%
about even with SPY
0.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.
7.3 pts behind QQQ
CAIQ since launch: paid 13.7%, price +4.7%, total +19.6%, QQQ +26.9%, −7.3 pts.
QQQ
+26.9%
CAIQ
+19.6%
13.7% of it arrived as cash
7.3 pts behind QQQ
Total return, distributions reinvested
7.3 pts behind QQQ
CAIQ since launch: paid 13.7%, price +4.7%, total +19.6%, QQQ +26.9%, −7.3 pts.
QQQ
+26.9%
CAIQ
+19.6%
7.3 pts behind QQQ
13.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +26.9%. CAIQ since launch: paid 13.7%, price +4.7%, total +19.6%, QQQ +26.9%, −7.3 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACBH | CAIQ | ACBH | CAIQ | ACBH | CAIQ |
| 3 months | not published | +2.6% | not published | 2.9% | not published | +0.5 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +18.4% | not published | 8.0% | not published | −8.4 pts |
| Since launch ACBH Sep 2026 · CAIQ Nov 2025 | +1.3% | +19.6% | 0.8% | 13.7% | +0.4 pts | −7.3 pts |
ACBH and CAIQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACBH and CAIQ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACBH in plain words
Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.
CAIQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Nov 20, 2025 to Sep 30, 2026, CAIQ paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +19.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +26.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 7.3 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.5%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACBH against CAIQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-caiq
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACBH against CAIQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-caiq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACBH against CAIQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-caiq
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACBH against CAIQ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-caiq
- Markdown
- [ACBH against CAIQ (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-caiq)