ACBH vs ACQQ: which paid, and which earned it?

ACBH and ACQQ both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF.

0.8%
ACBH cash paid, since launch
0.0%
ACQQ cash paid, since launch
+1.3%
ACBH total return, since launch
+1.6%
ACQQ total return, since launch
ACBH · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY
ACBH
+1.3%
SPY
+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

0.8% of it arrived as cash

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

0.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

ACQQ · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with QQQ
ACQQ
+1.6%
QQQ
+1.3%

About even with QQQ

ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.

QQQ

+1.3%

ACQQ

+1.6%

about even with QQQ

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with QQQ

ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.

QQQ

+1.3%

ACQQ

+1.6%

about even with QQQ

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +1.6%. ACQQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price +1.6%, total +1.6%, QQQ +1.3%, +0.3 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACBHACQQACBHACQQACBHACQQ
Since launch
ACBH Sep 2026 · ACQQ Aug 2026
+1.3%+1.6%0.8%0.0%+0.4 pts+0.3 pts

ACBH and ACQQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACBH
Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY
ACQQ
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on QQQ
Issuer Pacer ProShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Pays not established not established
Payout rate, annualized 10.1% not published
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.72%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.8% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +0.4% +1.6%
Total return, 1 year +1.3% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) +1.6% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% +1.3%
Ahead or behind +0.4 pts +0.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 20 days 47 days
Net assets $3m $26m

ACBH and ACQQ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACBH in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.

ACQQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACQQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.6%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +1.3% over the same days, so a holder was about even.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBH or ACQQ?
ACBH charges 0.60% a year and ACQQ charges 0.72%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACBH against ACQQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-acqq

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.