ACBH vs JANH: which paid, and which earned it?

ACBH and JANH both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January.

0.8%
ACBH cash paid, since launch
6.3%
JANH cash paid, 1 year
+1.3%
ACBH total return, since launch
+6.5%
JANH total return, 1 year
ACBH · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY
ACBH
+1.3%
SPY
+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

0.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

JANH · 1 year to Sep 30, 20269.2 pts behind SPY
JANH
+6.5%
SPY
+15.7%

9.2 pts behind SPY

JANH over 1 year: paid 6.3%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +15.7%, −9.2 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

JANH

+6.5%

6.3% of it arrived as cash

9.2 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.2 pts behind SPY

JANH over 1 year: paid 6.3%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +15.7%, −9.2 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

JANH

+6.5%

9.2 pts behind SPY

6.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +15.7%. JANH over 1 year: paid 6.3%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +15.7%, −9.2 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACBHJANHACBHJANHACBHJANH
3 monthsnot published+1.6%not published1.6%not published−0.9 pts
6 monthsnot published+6.1%not published3.2%not published−10.9 pts
1 yearnot published+6.5%not published6.3%not published−9.2 pts
Since launch
ACBH Sep 2026 · JANH Jan 2024
+1.3%+20.0%0.8%17.7%+0.4 pts−46.6 pts

ACBH and JANH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACBH
Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY
JANH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
Issuer Pacer Innovator
Strategy autocallable defined income
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays not established quarterly
Payout rate, annualized 10.1% 6.3%
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.8% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 6.3%
Price change, 1 year +0.4% +0.1%
Total return, 1 year +1.3% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) +6.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% +15.7%
Ahead or behind +0.4 pts −9.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 20 days 1002 days
Net assets $3m $12m

ACBH and JANH on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACBH in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.

JANH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, JANH paid 6.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBH or JANH?
ACBH charges 0.60% a year and JANH charges 0.79%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACBH against JANH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-janh

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.