ACBH vs JULJ: which paid, and which earned it?
ACBH and JULJ both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July.
About even with SPY
ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.
SPY
+0.9%
ACBH
+1.3%
about even with SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with SPY
ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.
SPY
+0.9%
ACBH
+1.3%
about even with SPY
0.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.
10.6 pts behind SPY
JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.7%, price −0.7%, total +5.1%, SPY +15.7%, −10.6 pts.
SPY
+15.7%
JULJ
+5.1%
5.7% of it arrived as cash
10.6 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
10.6 pts behind SPY
JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.7%, price −0.7%, total +5.1%, SPY +15.7%, −10.6 pts.
SPY
+15.7%
JULJ
+5.1%
10.6 pts behind SPY
5.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +15.7%. JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.7%, price −0.7%, total +5.1%, SPY +15.7%, −10.6 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACBH | JULJ | ACBH | JULJ | ACBH | JULJ |
| 3 months | not published | +1.6% | not published | 1.4% | not published | −0.9 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +2.8% | not published | 2.7% | not published | −14.2 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +5.1% | not published | 5.7% | not published | −10.6 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +19.3% | not published | 17.4% | not published | −65.7 pts |
| Since launch ACBH Sep 2026 · JULJ Jul 2023 | +1.3% | +20.6% | 0.8% | 19.0% | +0.4 pts | −58.2 pts |
ACBH and JULJ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACBH and JULJ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACBH in plain words
Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.
JULJ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, JULJ paid 5.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 10.6 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.4%, paid quarterly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACBH against JULJ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-julj
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACBH against JULJ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-julj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACBH against JULJ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-julj
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACBH against JULJ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-julj
- Markdown
- [ACBH against JULJ (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-julj)