ACBH vs JULH: which paid, and which earned it?
ACBH and JULH both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July.
About even with SPY
ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.
SPY
+0.9%
ACBH
+1.3%
about even with SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with SPY
ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.
SPY
+0.9%
ACBH
+1.3%
about even with SPY
0.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.
11.2 pts behind SPY
JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.
SPY
+15.7%
JULH
+4.5%
4.8% as cash
11.2 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
11.2 pts behind SPY
JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.
SPY
+15.7%
JULH
+4.5%
11.2 pts behind SPY
4.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +15.7%. JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACBH | JULH | ACBH | JULH | ACBH | JULH |
| 3 months | not published | +2.0% | not published | 1.6% | not published | −0.5 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +3.6% | not published | 2.7% | not published | −13.4 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +4.5% | not published | 4.8% | not published | −11.2 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +21.9% | not published | 18.6% | not published | −63.0 pts |
| Since launch ACBH Sep 2026 · JULH Jul 2023 | +1.3% | +22.9% | 0.8% | 20.3% | +0.4 pts | −55.9 pts |
ACBH and JULH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACBH and JULH on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACBH in plain words
Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.
JULH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.6%, paid quarterly.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACBH against JULH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-julh
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACBH against JULH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-julh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACBH against JULH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-julh
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACBH against JULH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-julh
- Markdown
- [ACBH against JULH (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-julh)