Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BIGY vs JULH: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year BIGY paid 12.5% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.7%, and returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) Target 12(TM) Big 50 Option Income ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July.

12.5%BIGY cash paid, 1 year
4.7%JULH cash paid, 1 year
+13.0%BIGY total return, 1 year
+4.5%JULH total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BIGY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

BIGY 52.6JULH 35.93.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BIGY3.6 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%BIGY+13.0%12.5% of it arrived as cash3.6 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%BIGY+13.0%12.5% as cash3.6 pts behind SPY
JULH12.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%JULH+4.5%4.7% as cash12.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%JULH+4.5%12.1 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BIGY and JULH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in BIGYOnly in JULH
Apple Inc 7.21%TREASURY BILL 100.00%
NVIDIA Corp 6.66%
Amazon.com Inc 4.95%
Alphabet Inc 4.84%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.19%
Microsoft Corp 3.84%
Meta Platforms Inc 3.70%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 3.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BIGY and JULH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BIGYJULHBIGYJULHBIGYJULH
3 months+2.6%+1.8%3.0%1.1%+0.3 pts−0.4 pts
6 months+15.0%+4.0%6.9%2.7%−3.0 pts−14.0 pts
1 year+13.0%+4.5%12.5%4.7%−3.6 pts−12.1 pts
3 yearsnot published+20.7%not published18.4%not published−57.7 pts
Since launch+28.9%+22.7%21.8%18.6%−2.4 pts−55.9 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BIGY and JULH on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BIGY
YieldMax(R) Target 12(TM) Big 50 Option Income ETF
Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying monthly
JULH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
IssuerYieldMaxInnovator
Strategysynthetic covered calldefined income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyquarterly
Payout rate, annualized12.1%4.2%
Expense ratio1.09%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year12.5%4.7%
Price change, 1 year−0.3%−0.4%
Total return, 1 year+13.0%+4.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−3.6 pts−12.1 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate0%not published
Age666 days1173 days
Net assets$33m$17m

BIGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BIGY paid 12.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.1%, paid monthly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

JULH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.2%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, BIGY or JULH?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BIGY paid 12.5% of its starting price in cash and JULH paid 4.7%, so BIGY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, BIGY or JULH?
With every distribution reinvested, BIGY returned +13.0% and JULH returned +4.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so BIGY returned more.
Which is cheaper, BIGY or JULH?
BIGY charges 1.09% a year and JULH charges 0.79%, so JULH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BIGY against JULH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BIGY against JULH, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bigy-vs-julh Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources