Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
JULH vs XSPI: Dividend Yield & Total Return
JULH and XSPI both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about JULH and XSPI
Net assets: $18m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July, and $140m on Oct 28, 2026 for NEOS Boosted S&P 500 High Income ETF.
9.9 pts behind SPY
JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
JULH
+4.9%
4.8% of it arrived as cash
9.9 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
9.9 pts behind SPY
JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
JULH
+4.9%
9.9 pts behind SPY
4.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.About even with SPY
XSPI since launch: paid 13.9%, price −2.3%, total +12.4%, SPY +12.1%, +0.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+12.1%
XSPI
+12.4%
13.9% of it arrived as cash
about even with SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with SPY
XSPI since launch: paid 13.9%, price −2.3%, total +12.4%, SPY +12.1%, +0.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+12.1%
XSPI
+12.4%
13.9% as cash
about even with SPY
13.9% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. XSPI since launch: paid 13.9%, price −2.3%, total +12.4%, SPY +12.1%, +0.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
JULH costs 0.19 points a year less; XSPI is 8.2 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | JULH | XSPI |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +4.9% | not published |
| Price change | fell 0.0% (1 year) | fell 2.3% (since Feb 3, 2026) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 51% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment | 98% of the Oct 9, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | S&P 500, measured through SPY | S&P 500, measured through SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.98% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 28, 2026 | $17m | $140m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, JULH and XSPI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | JULH | XSPI | JULH | XSPI | JULH | XSPI |
| 3 months | +1.4% | +1.1% | 1.6% | 4.2% | +1.5 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +3.2% | +7.0% | 2.7% | 8.5% | −1.8 pts | +2.0 pts |
| 1 year | +4.9% | – | 4.8% | – | −9.9 pts | – |
| 3 years | +20.9% | – | 18.4% | – | −62.0 pts | – |
| Since launchNot the same days: JULH Jul 2023 · XSPI Feb 2026 | +23.7% | +12.4% | 20.3% | 13.9% | −56.1 pts | +0.3 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
JULH
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.5%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 51% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
XSPI
Over the period from its first trade on Feb 3, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, XSPI paid 13.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +12.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +12.1% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 16.6%, paid monthly. NEOS estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Oct 9, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, JULH against XSPI, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-xspi
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). JULH against XSPI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-xspi
[JULH against XSPI (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-xspi)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.