Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

BIGY vs QUSA: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year QUSA paid 13.8% of its price in cash against BIGY’s 12.5%, though BIGY returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) Target 12(TM) Big 50 Option Income ETF and VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF.

12.5%BIGY cash paid, 1 year
13.8%QUSA cash paid, 1 year
+13.0%BIGY total return, 1 year
+3.5%QUSA total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: BIGY scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

BIGY 52.6QUSA 21.43.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

BIGY3.6 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%BIGY+13.0%12.5% of it arrived as cash3.6 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%BIGY+13.0%12.5% as cash3.6 pts behind SPY
QUSA11.7 pts behind QUAL · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%13.8% as cash11.7 pts behind QUALTotal return, distributions reinvestedQUAL+15.2%QUSA+3.5%11.7 pts behind QUAL

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BIGY and QUSA hold 51% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions BIGY and QUSA both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingBIGYQUSA
Apple Inc6.13%5.99%
NVIDIA Corp6.30%5.78%
Broadcom Inc3.73%4.70%
Meta Platforms Inc3.59%4.28%
Microsoft Corp3.35%6.08%
Walmart Inc3.32%4.17%
Caterpillar Inc2.73%4.91%
Alphabet Inc5.61%2.22%
Netflix Inc2.19%3.79%
Costco Wholesale Corp2.06%4.40%
Johnson & Johnson2.01%2.93%
Visa Inc1.97%3.37%
Only in each
Only in BIGYOnly in QUSA
Amazon.com Inc 5.45%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 5.35%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.06%Lam Research Corp 3.47%
Texas Instruments Inc 2.83%Blackrock Inc 2.99%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.80%KLA CORP 2.69%
Tesla Inc 2.60%Applied Materials Inc 2.61%
Chevron Corp 2.25%Alphabet Inc 1.84%
Exxon Mobil Corp 2.23%Lockheed Martin Corp 1.76%
Bank of America Corp 2.02%Fortinet Inc 1.49%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

BIGY and QUSA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
BIGYQUSABIGYQUSABIGYQUSA
3 months+2.6%−1.9%3.0%3.6%+0.3 pts−3.6 pts
6 months+15.0%+10.4%6.9%7.8%−3.0 pts−4.3 pts
1 year+13.0%+3.5%12.5%13.8%−3.6 pts−11.7 pts
Since launch+28.9%+4.9%21.8%15.1%−2.4 pts−25.8 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
BIGY and QUSA on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
BIGY
YieldMax(R) Target 12(TM) Big 50 Option Income ETF
Synthetic covered call on SPY, paying monthly
QUSA
VistaShares Target 15 USA Quality Income ETF
Covered call on QUAL, paying monthly
IssuerYieldMaxVistaShares
Strategysynthetic covered callcovered call
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyUSA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy
Paysmonthlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized12.1%15.3%
Expense ratio1.09%0.97%
Cash paid, 1 year12.5%13.8%
Price change, 1 year−0.3%−11.0%
Total return, 1 year+13.0%+3.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+15.2%
Ahead or behind−3.6 pts−11.7 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate0%not published
Age666 days500 days
Net assets$33m$22m

BIGY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BIGY paid 12.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.3%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.0%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.6 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.1%, paid monthly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 3, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

QUSA in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, QUSA paid 13.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 11.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +3.5%. USA Quality (QUAL), used as the quality proxy returned +15.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, BIGY or QUSA?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, BIGY paid 12.5% of its starting price in cash and QUSA paid 13.8%, so QUSA paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, BIGY or QUSA?
With every distribution reinvested, BIGY returned +13.0% and QUSA returned +3.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so BIGY returned more.
Which is cheaper, BIGY or QUSA?
BIGY charges 1.09% a year and QUSA charges 0.97%, so QUSA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BIGY against QUSA, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BIGY against QUSA, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/bigy-vs-qusa Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources