Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

ACKY vs JULJ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year ACKY paid 13.9% of its price in cash against JULJ’s 5.5%, though JULJ returned more with it reinvested.

VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF and Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July.

13.9%ACKY cash paid, 1 year
5.5%JULJ cash paid, 1 year
−1.3%ACKY total return, 1 year
+5.1%JULJ total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: JULJ scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

ACKY 12.7JULJ 36.43.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

ACKY17.9 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%ACKY−1.3%17.9 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%ACKY−1.3%17.9 pts behind SPY
JULJ11.5 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%JULJ+5.1%5.5% as cash11.5 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%JULJ+5.1%11.5 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACKY and JULJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in ACKYOnly in JULJ
Microsoft Corp 11.56%TREASURY BILL 100.00%
Brookfield Corp 11.16%
Uber Technologies Inc 10.74%
Pershing Square USA Ltd 10.50%
Meta Platforms Inc 10.23%
Amazon.com Inc 9.95%
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc 8.86%
Restaurant Brands International Inc 8.22%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

ACKY and JULJ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
ACKYJULJACKYJULJACKYJULJ
3 months+0.8%+1.5%3.7%1.3%−1.5 pts−0.7 pts
6 months+5.8%+3.1%7.7%2.6%−12.2 pts−14.9 pts
1 year−1.3%+5.1%13.9%5.5%−17.9 pts−11.5 pts
3 yearsnot published+18.8%not published17.4%not published−59.6 pts
Since launch−0.4%+20.4%14.0%17.6%−19.1 pts−58.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
ACKY and JULJ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACKY
VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF
Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
JULJ
Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
IssuerVistaSharesInnovator
Strategycovered calldefined income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxyS&P 500 (SPY)
Paysmonthlyquarterly
Payout rate, annualized15.7%5.2%
Expense ratio0.95%0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year13.9%5.5%
Price change, 1 year−15.1%−0.6%
Total return, 1 year−1.3%+5.1%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−17.9 pts−11.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot publishednot published
Age374 days1173 days
Net assets$45m$14m

ACKY in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACKY paid 13.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 15.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 17.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.7%, paid monthly.

JULJ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULJ paid 5.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.6%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.1%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.2%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ACKY or JULJ?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, ACKY paid 13.9% of its starting price in cash and JULJ paid 5.5%, so ACKY paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACKY or JULJ?
With every distribution reinvested, ACKY returned −1.3% and JULJ returned +5.1% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so JULJ returned more.
Which is cheaper, ACKY or JULJ?
ACKY charges 0.95% a year and JULJ charges 0.79%, so JULJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

ACKY against JULJ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACKY against JULJ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acky-vs-julj Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources