IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

JULJ vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its price in cash against JULJ’s 5.6%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about JULJ and OMAH

Net assets: $14m on Nov 4, 2026 for Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July, and $1.1bn on Nov 3, 2026 for VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF.

JULJ on its own →OMAH on its own →
At a glance
5.6%
JULJ cash paid, 1 year
14.7%
OMAH cash paid, 1 year
+5.4%
JULJ total return, 1 year
+13.5%
OMAH total return, 1 year
JULJ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 9.4 pts behind SPY
JULJ
+5.4%
SPY
+14.8%

9.4 pts behind SPY

JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULJ

+5.4%

5.6% of it arrived as cash

9.4 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.4 pts behind SPY

JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

JULJ

+5.4%

9.4 pts behind SPY

5.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. JULJ over 1 year: paid 5.6%, price −0.4%, total +5.4%, SPY +14.8%, −9.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
OMAH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.3 pts behind SPY
OMAH
+13.5%
SPY
+14.8%

1.3 pts behind SPY

OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OMAH

+13.5%

14.7% of it arrived as cash

1.3 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.3 pts behind SPY

OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OMAH

+13.5%

14.7% as cash

1.3 pts behind SPY

14.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

JULJ costs 0.19 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.1 points; OMAH is far larger, $1.1bn against $14m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

JULJ vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureJULJOMAH
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+5.4%+13.5%
Price change, 1 yearfell 0.4%fell 2.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate39% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYS&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.79%0.98%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$14m$1.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · JULJ scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score54.2JULJ53OMAH

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, JULJ and OMAH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first JULJ OMAH
Only in one fund ↓
Only in JULJ
Only in OMAH
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.99%
Apple Inc 10.43%
American Express Co 6.64%
Kroger Co 5.21%
Coca-Cola Co 5.08%
Sirius XM Holdings Inc 4.97%
VeriSign Inc 4.86%
Moody's Corp 4.72%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

JULJ Innovator Premium Income 30 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
Issuer Innovator VistaShares
Strategy defined income covered call
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays quarterly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 5.4% 15.0%
Expense ratio 0.79% 0.98%
Cash paid, 1 year 5.6% 14.7%
Price change, 1 year −0.4% −2.4%
Total return, 1 year +5.4% +13.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +14.8%
Ahead or behind −9.4 pts −1.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 39% 100%
Age 3.3 years 1.7 years
Net assets, JULJ as of Nov 4, 2026 and OMAH as of Nov 3, 2026 $14m $1.1bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: JULJ vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowJULJOMAHJULJOMAHJULJOMAH
3 months+1.3%+2.5%1.3%3.7%+1.5 pts+2.6 pts
6 months+2.6%+6.2%2.7%7.4%−2.4 pts+1.2 pts
1 year+5.4%+13.5%5.6%14.7%−9.4 pts−1.3 pts
3 years+18.6%–17.3%–−64.3 pts–
Since launchNot the same days: JULJ Jul 2023 · OMAH Mar 2025+21.3%+19.2%19.0%23.7%−58.5 pts−14.9 pts

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

JULJ and OMAH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
JULJ

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULJ paid 5.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +5.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.4%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 39% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

OMAH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.0%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JULJ or OMAH?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULJ paid 5.6% of its starting price in cash and OMAH paid 14.7%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JULJ or OMAH?
With every distribution reinvested, JULJ returned +5.4% and OMAH +13.5% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, JULJ or OMAH?
JULJ charges 0.79% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so JULJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
JULJ vs ROCYJULJ vs BALIJULJ vs XYLDJULJ vs DIVOOMAH vs NLSIOMAH vs ACKYOMAH vs SPINOMAH vs OEI
Where to next
S&P 500 (SPY) →JULJ on its own →OMAH on its own →JULJ dividend history →OMAH dividend history →OMAH holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
JULJ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
JULJ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
JULJ 19a-1 distribution notice ↗
Innovator page for JULJ ↗
OMAH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
OMAH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
OMAH 19a-1 distribution notice ↗
VistaShares page for OMAH ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JULJ against OMAH, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julj-vs-omah

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.