Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Income ETFs

ACKY vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its price in cash against ACKY’s 14.0%, and returned more with it reinvested.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ACKY and OMAH

Net assets on Nov 3, 2026: $45m for VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF and $1.1bn for VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF.

At a glance
14.0%
ACKY cash paid, 1 year
14.7%
OMAH cash paid, 1 year
+6.4%
ACKY total return, 1 year
+13.5%
OMAH total return, 1 year
ACKY · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 8.4 pts behind SPY
ACKY
+6.4%
SPY
+14.8%

8.4 pts behind SPY

ACKY over 1 year: paid 14.0%, price −8.5%, total +6.4%, SPY +14.8%, −8.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

ACKY

+6.4%

14.0% of it arrived as cash

8.4 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

8.4 pts behind SPY

ACKY over 1 year: paid 14.0%, price −8.5%, total +6.4%, SPY +14.8%, −8.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

ACKY

+6.4%

8.4 pts behind SPY

14.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACKY over 1 year: paid 14.0%, price −8.5%, total +6.4%, SPY +14.8%, −8.4 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.
OMAH · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 1.3 pts behind SPY
OMAH
+13.5%
SPY
+14.8%

1.3 pts behind SPY

OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OMAH

+13.5%

14.7% of it arrived as cash

1.3 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.3 pts behind SPY

OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

SPY

+14.8%

OMAH

+13.5%

14.7% as cash

1.3 pts behind SPY

14.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. OMAH over 1 year: paid 14.7%, price −2.4%, total +13.5%, SPY +14.8%, −1.3 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Data to Nov 4, 2026.

Pair scorecard

ACKY costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.1 points; OMAH is far larger, $1.1bn against $45m.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

ACKY vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
MeasureACKYOMAH
Paid and earned
Total return, 1 year+6.4%+13.5%
Price change, 1 yearfell 8.5%fell 2.4%
Return of capital, issuer estimate98% of the Sep 29, 2026 payment100% of the Oct 27, 2026 payment
Against its benchmark
BenchmarkS&P 500, measured through SPYS&P 500, measured through SPY
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.95%0.98%
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026$45m$1.1bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
ETFIQ Distribution Coverage Score · OMAH scores higher How much of what it paid out did its total return cover?
IQ Income Score34.4ACKY53OMAH

How much of its payouts the fund's total return covered, ranked against 167 income ETFs not writing on a single company. 100 is best. How it is computed

0.3, the lowest in this set 99.7, the highest

One year only, and a ratio of two published numbers: it says nothing about where a distribution came from. All income ETFs ranked by it →

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ACKY and OMAH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 4, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ACKY OMAH
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ACKY
Microsoft Corp 12.01%
Brookfield Corp 11.51%
Howard Hughes Holdings Inc 10.79%
Uber Technologies Inc 9.89%
Pershing Square USA Ltd 9.73%
Amazon.com Inc 9.54%
Meta Platforms Inc 9.13%
Restaurant Brands International Inc 8.26%
Only in OMAH
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 10.99%
Apple Inc 10.43%
American Express Co 6.64%
Kroger Co 5.21%
Coca-Cola Co 5.08%
Sirius XM Holdings Inc 4.97%
VeriSign Inc 4.86%
Moody's Corp 4.72%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

ACKY VistaShares Target 15 ACKtivist Distribution ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly OMAH VistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF · Covered call on SPY, paying monthly
Strategy covered call covered call
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 14.5% 15.0%
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.98%
Cash paid, 1 year 14.0% 14.7%
Price change, 1 year −8.5% −2.4%
Total return, 1 year +6.4% +13.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year +14.8% +14.8%
Ahead or behind −8.4 pts −1.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 98% 100%
Age 1.2 years 1.7 years
Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 $45m $1.1bn

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.

Window by window

Window by window: ACKY vs OMAH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACKYOMAHACKYOMAHACKYOMAH
3 months+4.8%+2.5%3.7%3.7%+5.0 pts+2.6 pts
6 months+1.0%+6.2%6.9%7.4%−4.0 pts+1.2 pts
1 year+6.4%+13.5%14.0%14.7%−8.4 pts−1.3 pts
Since launchNot the same days: ACKY Sep 2025 · OMAH Mar 2025+6.9%+19.2%16.2%23.7%−12.6 pts−14.9 pts

Open this comparison in the app →

Alert

ACKY and OMAH flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ACKY

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ACKY paid 14.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.4%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 8.4 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.5%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Sep 29, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.

OMAH

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, OMAH paid 14.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.3 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 15.0%, paid monthly. VistaShares estimates that 100% of the distribution paid Oct 27, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, ACKY or OMAH?
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, ACKY paid 14.0% of its starting price in cash and OMAH paid 14.7%, so OMAH paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, ACKY or OMAH?
With every distribution reinvested, ACKY returned +6.4% and OMAH +13.5% over the year to Nov 4, 2026.
Which is cheaper, ACKY or OMAH?
ACKY charges 0.95% a year and OMAH charges 0.98%, so ACKY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Sources and dates

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACKY against OMAH, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acky-vs-omah

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.