ATC vs JANQ: which paid, and which earned it?

ATC and JANQ both write options for income. GraniteShares Autocallable COIN ETF and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - January.

10.8%
ATC cash paid, since launch
0.0%
JANQ cash paid, since launch
+14.8%
ATC total return, since launch
0.0%
JANQ total return, since launch
ATC · since launch to Sep 30, 202625 pts ahead of COIN
ATC
+14.8%
COIN
−10.2%

25 pts ahead of COIN

ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

COIN

−10.2%

ATC

+14.8%

10.8% of it arrived as cash

25 pts ahead of COIN

Total return, distributions reinvested

25 pts ahead of COIN

ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

COIN

−10.2%

ATC

+14.8%

25 pts ahead of COIN

10.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

JANQ · since launch to Sep 30, 20260.9 pts behind SPY
JANQ
0.0%
SPY
+0.9%

0.9 pts behind SPY

JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

JANQ

0.0%

0.9 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

0.9 pts behind SPY

JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

JANQ

0.0%

0.9 pts behind SPY

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.8%. JANQ since launch: paid 0.0%, price 0.0%, total 0.0%, SPY +0.9%, −0.9 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowATCJANQATCJANQATCJANQ
3 months+23.3%not published6.2%not published+6.2 ptsnot published
Since launch
ATC May 2026 · JANQ Sep 2026
+14.8%0.0%10.8%0.0%+25.0 pts−0.9 pts

ATC and JANQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ATC
GraniteShares Autocallable COIN ETF · Autocallable on COIN, paying monthly
JANQ
Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - January · Defined income on SPY
Issuer GraniteShares Innovator
Strategy autocallable defined income
Benchmark Coinbase (COIN) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays monthly not established
Payout rate, annualized 36.1% not published
Expense ratio 1.07% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 10.8% (since launch on May 12, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +1.9% 0.0%
Total return, 1 year +14.8% (since launch on May 12, 2026) 0.0% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year −10.2% +0.9%
Ahead or behind +25.0 pts −0.9 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 2% not published
Age 141 days 20 days
Net assets $998,712 not published

ATC and JANQ on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ATC in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 12, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ATC paid 10.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.8%. Coinbase (COIN) returned −10.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 36.1%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 2% of the distribution paid Aug 14, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

JANQ in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, JANQ paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned 0.0%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 0.9 pts.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ATC or JANQ?
ATC charges 1.07% a year and JANQ charges 0.79%, so JANQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ATC against JANQ, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/atc-vs-janq

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.