ACSP vs ATC: which paid, and which earned it?

ACSP and ATC both write options for income. ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable COIN ETF.

0.0%
ACSP cash paid, since launch
10.8%
ATC cash paid, since launch
−3.9%
ACSP total return, since launch
+14.8%
ATC total return, since launch
ACSP · since launch to Sep 30, 20262.4 pts behind SPY
ACSP
−3.9%
SPY
−1.5%

2.4 pts behind SPY

ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.

SPY

−1.5%

ACSP

−3.9%

2.4 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.4 pts behind SPY

ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.

SPY

−1.5%

ACSP

−3.9%

2.4 pts behind SPY

0.0% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACSP since launch: paid 0.0%, price −3.9%, total −3.9%, SPY −1.5%, −2.4 pts.

ATC · since launch to Sep 30, 202625 pts ahead of COIN
ATC
+14.8%
COIN
−10.2%

25 pts ahead of COIN

ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

COIN

−10.2%

ATC

+14.8%

10.8% of it arrived as cash

25 pts ahead of COIN

Total return, distributions reinvested

25 pts ahead of COIN

ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

COIN

−10.2%

ATC

+14.8%

25 pts ahead of COIN

10.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +14.8%. ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and ATC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ACSP ATC
Only in ACSP
S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00%
Only in ATC
Treasury Bill 100.00%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACSPATCACSPATCACSPATC
3 monthsnot published+23.3%not published6.2%not published+6.2 pts
Since launch
ACSP Aug 2026 · ATC May 2026
−3.9%+14.8%0.0%10.8%−2.4 pts+25.0 pts

ACSP and ATC over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACSP
ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY
ATC
GraniteShares Autocallable COIN ETF · Autocallable on COIN, paying monthly
Issuer ProShares GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY) Coinbase (COIN)
Pays not established monthly
Payout rate, annualized not published 36.1%
Expense ratio 0.72% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) 10.8% (since launch on May 12, 2026)
Price change, 1 year −3.9% +1.9%
Total return, 1 year −3.9% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) +14.8% (since launch on May 12, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year −1.5% −10.2%
Ahead or behind −2.4 pts +25.0 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published 2%
Age 47 days 141 days
Net assets $27m $998,712

ACSP and ATC on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACSP in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.5% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.4 pts.

ATC in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 12, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ATC paid 10.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.8%. Coinbase (COIN) returned −10.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 36.1%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 2% of the distribution paid Aug 14, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACSP or ATC?
ACSP charges 0.72% a year and ATC charges 1.07%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACSP against ATC, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-atc

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.