ATC vs JULH: which paid, and which earned it?

ATC and JULH both write options for income. GraniteShares Autocallable COIN ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July.

10.8%
ATC cash paid, since launch
4.8%
JULH cash paid, 1 year
+14.8%
ATC total return, since launch
+4.5%
JULH total return, 1 year
ATC · since launch to Sep 30, 202625 pts ahead of COIN
ATC
+14.8%
COIN
−10.2%

25 pts ahead of COIN

ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

COIN

−10.2%

ATC

+14.8%

10.8% of it arrived as cash

25 pts ahead of COIN

Total return, distributions reinvested

25 pts ahead of COIN

ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

COIN

−10.2%

ATC

+14.8%

25 pts ahead of COIN

10.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

JULH · 1 year to Sep 30, 202611.2 pts behind SPY
JULH
+4.5%
SPY
+15.7%

11.2 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

JULH

+4.5%

4.8% as cash

11.2 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

11.2 pts behind SPY

JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

JULH

+4.5%

11.2 pts behind SPY

4.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +15.7%. JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price −0.4%, total +4.5%, SPY +15.7%, −11.2 pts.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ATC and JULH hold 100% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

half

100% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ATC JULH
Treasury Bill 100.00% 100.00%
Only in ATC
Only in JULH

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowATCJULHATCJULHATCJULH
3 months+23.3%+2.0%6.2%1.6%+6.2 pts−0.5 pts
6 monthsnot published+3.6%not published2.7%not published−13.4 pts
1 yearnot published+4.5%not published4.8%not published−11.2 pts
3 yearsnot published+21.9%not published18.6%not published−63.0 pts
Since launch
ATC May 2026 · JULH Jul 2023
+14.8%+22.9%10.8%20.3%+25.0 pts−55.9 pts

ATC and JULH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ATC
GraniteShares Autocallable COIN ETF · Autocallable on COIN, paying monthly
JULH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
Issuer GraniteShares Innovator
Strategy autocallable defined income
Benchmark Coinbase (COIN) S&P 500 (SPY)
Pays monthly quarterly
Payout rate, annualized 36.1% 6.6%
Expense ratio 1.07% 0.79%
Cash paid, 1 year 10.8% (since launch on May 12, 2026) 4.8%
Price change, 1 year +1.9% −0.4%
Total return, 1 year +14.8% (since launch on May 12, 2026) +4.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year −10.2% +15.7%
Ahead or behind +25.0 pts −11.2 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate 2% not published
Age 141 days 1185 days
Net assets $998,712 $17m

ATC and JULH on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ATC in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 12, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ATC paid 10.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.8%. Coinbase (COIN) returned −10.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 36.1%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 2% of the distribution paid Aug 14, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

JULH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.6%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ATC or JULH?
ATC charges 1.07% a year and JULH charges 0.79%, so JULH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ATC against JULH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/atc-vs-julh

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.