Which is cheaper, ATC or JANH?

ATC charges 1.07% a year and JANH charges 0.79%, so JANH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

ATC vs JANH: which paid, and which earned it?

ATC and JANH both write options for income. GraniteShares Autocallable COIN ETF and Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January.

10.8%

ATC cash paid, since launch

6.3%

JANH cash paid, 1 year

+14.8%

ATC total return, since launch

+6.5%

JANH total return, 1 year

ATC · since launch to Sep 30, 202625 pts ahead of COIN

ATC

+14.8%

COIN

−10.2%

25 pts ahead of COIN

ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

COIN

−10.2%

ATC

+14.8%

10.8% of it arrived as cash

25 pts ahead of COIN

Total return, distributions reinvested

25 pts ahead of COIN

ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

COIN

−10.2%

ATC

+14.8%

25 pts ahead of COIN

10.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ATC since launch: paid 10.8%, price +1.9%, total +14.8%, COIN −10.2%, +25.0 pts.

JANH · 1 year to Sep 30, 20269.2 pts behind SPY

JANH

+6.5%

SPY

+15.7%

9.2 pts behind SPY

JANH over 1 year: paid 6.3%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +15.7%, −9.2 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

JANH

+6.5%

6.3% as cash

9.2 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

9.2 pts behind SPY

JANH over 1 year: paid 6.3%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +15.7%, −9.2 pts.

SPY

+15.7%

JANH

+6.5%

9.2 pts behind SPY

6.3% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +15.7%. JANH over 1 year: paid 6.3%, price +0.1%, total +6.5%, SPY +15.7%, −9.2 pts.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ATC and JANH hold 97% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

50%

half

97% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding ATC JANH

Treasury Bill 100.00% 96.95%

Only in ATC

Only in JANH

TREASURY BILL 1.53%

TREASURY BILL 1.52%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ATC	JANH	ATC	JANH	ATC	JANH
3 months	+23.3%	+1.6%	6.2%	1.6%	+6.2 pts	−0.9 pts
6 months	not published	+6.1%	not published	3.2%	not published	−10.9 pts
1 year	not published	+6.5%	not published	6.3%	not published	−9.2 pts
Since launch ATC May 2026 · JANH Jan 2024	+14.8%	+20.0%	10.8%	17.7%	+25.0 pts	−46.6 pts

ATC and JANH over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ATC

GraniteShares Autocallable COIN ETF · Autocallable on COIN, paying monthly

JANH

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - January · Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly

Issuer GraniteShares Innovator

Strategy autocallable defined income

Benchmark Coinbase (COIN) S&P 500 (SPY)

Pays monthly quarterly

Payout rate, annualized 36.1% 6.3%

Expense ratio 1.07% 0.79%

Cash paid, 1 year 10.8% (since launch on May 12, 2026) 6.3%

Price change, 1 year +1.9% +0.1%

Total return, 1 year +14.8% (since launch on May 12, 2026) +6.5%

Benchmark return, 1 year −10.2% +15.7%

Ahead or behind +25.0 pts −9.2 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate 2% not published

Age 141 days 1002 days

Net assets $998,712 $12m

ATC and JANH on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ATC in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 12, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ATC paid 10.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 1.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +14.8%. Coinbase (COIN) returned −10.2% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.0 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 36.1%, paid monthly. GraniteShares estimates that 2% of the distribution paid Aug 14, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

JANH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 30, 2026, JANH paid 6.3% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +15.7% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid quarterly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ATC or JANH?: ATC charges 1.07% a year and JANH charges 0.79%, so JANH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ATC vs IACL ATC vs JANJ ATC vs JANQ ATC vs JULH JANH vs KHPI JANH vs KIQQ JANH vs KNG JANH vs KYLD

S&P 500 (SPY) →ATC on its own →JANH on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ATC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ATC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗ATC 19a-1 distribution notice ↗GraniteShares page for ATC ↗JANH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗JANH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Innovator page for JANH ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ATC against JANH, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/atc-vs-janh

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.