Data as of .
JULH vs KIQQ: which paid, and which earned it?
JULH and KIQQ both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, JULH and KIQQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in JULH | Only in KIQQ |
|---|---|
| TREASURY BILL 100.00% | +NDXDBHIO/-FED FUNDS 100.58% |
| NVIDIA CORP 8.90% | |
| APPLE INC 8.20% | |
| MICROSOFT CORP 6.17% | |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC 5.14% | |
| AMAZON.COM INC 4.50% | |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 4.21% | |
| ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.40% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JULH | KIQQ | JULH | KIQQ | JULH | KIQQ | |
| 3 months | +1.8% | −3.2% | 1.1% | 1.9% | −0.4 pts | −0.7 pts |
| 6 months | +4.0% | +11.9% | 2.7% | 4.5% | −14.0 pts | −12.3 pts |
| 1 year | +4.5% | not published | 4.7% | not published | −12.1 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +20.7% | not published | 18.4% | not published | −57.7 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +22.7% | +6.0% | 18.6% | 5.8% | −55.9 pts | −9.9 pts |
| JULH Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly | KIQQ KraneShares InspereX Nasdaq Dynamic Buffered High Income Index ETF Buffer with income on QQQ, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Innovator | KraneShares |
| Strategy | defined income | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) |
| Pays | quarterly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 4.2% | 6.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.79% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 4.7% | 5.8% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) |
| Price change, 1 year | −0.4% | −0.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.5% | +6.0% (since launch on Jan 7, 2026) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +16.6% | +15.9% |
| Ahead or behind | −12.1 pts | −9.9 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 1173 days | 254 days |
| Net assets | $17m | $3m |
JULH in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.2%, paid quarterly.
KIQQ in plain words
Over the period since launch on Jan 7, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, KIQQ paid 5.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +6.0%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +15.9% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, JULH or KIQQ?
- JULH charges 0.79% a year and KIQQ charges 0.79%, so JULH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, JULH against KIQQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-kiqq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.