Data as of .
ACSP vs XIMR: which paid, and which earned it?
ACSP and XIMR both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and XIMR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACSP | Only in XIMR |
|---|---|
| S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00% | 2027-03-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust C 0.06 114.57% |
| 2027-03-19 State Street® SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust P 648.56 1.15% | |
| US Dollar 0.78% | |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/01/2026 0.60% | |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 10/29/2026 0.60% | |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 01/21/2027 0.59% | |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 02/18/2027 0.59% | |
| U.S. Treasury Bill, 0%, due 03/18/2027 0.59% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACSP | XIMR | ACSP | XIMR | ACSP | XIMR | |
| 3 months | not published | +1.5% | not published | 1.8% | not published | −0.8 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +5.0% | not published | 3.1% | not published | −13.1 pts |
| 1 year | not published | +7.5% | not published | 6.7% | not published | −9.1 pts |
| Since launch | −3.8% | +19.2% | 0.0% | 16.2% | −2.1 pts | −32.9 pts |
| ACSP ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on SPY | XIMR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer & Premium Income ETF - March Buffer with income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | First Trust |
| Strategy | option income | buffer with income |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 7.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.85% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 6.7% |
| Price change, 1 year | −3.8% | +0.5% |
| Total return, 1 year | −3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +7.5% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.6% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.1 pts | −9.1 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 35 days | 913 days |
| Net assets | $27m | $27m |
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.
XIMR in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XIMR paid 6.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.5%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +7.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.3%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACSP or XIMR?
- ACSP charges 0.72% a year and XIMR charges 0.85%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against XIMR, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-ximr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.