Data as of .
ACSP vs DRKY: which paid, and which earned it?
ACSP and DRKY both write options for income.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and DRKY hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in ACSP | Only in DRKY |
|---|---|
| S&P500 FUTURES 35% AUTOCALL SWAP BANK OF AMERICA NA 100.00% | Natera Inc 25.22% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 9.17% | |
| STMicroelectronics NV 7.49% | |
| YPF SA 4.78% | |
| Insmed Inc 4.62% | |
| Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 4.52% | |
| Alphabet Inc 4.45% | |
| Amazon.com Inc 4.42% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026 and Sep 21, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACSP | DRKY | ACSP | DRKY | ACSP | DRKY | |
| 3 months | not published | +11.8% | not published | 3.8% | not published | +9.6 pts |
| 6 months | not published | +25.1% | not published | 8.1% | not published | +7.1 pts |
| Since launch | −3.8% | +24.1% | 0.0% | 14.1% | −2.1 pts | +9.7 pts |
| ACSP ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF Option income on SPY | DRKY VistaShares Target 15 DRUKMacro Distribution ETF Covered call on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | ProShares | VistaShares |
| Strategy | option income | covered call |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 (SPY) | S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy |
| Pays | not established | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | not published | 14.8% |
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.95% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 0.0% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | 14.1% (since launch on Oct 8, 2025) |
| Price change, 1 year | −3.8% | +8.1% |
| Total return, 1 year | −3.8% (since launch on Aug 14, 2026) | +24.1% (since launch on Oct 8, 2025) |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | −1.6% | +14.4% |
| Ahead or behind | −2.1 pts | +9.7 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | not published |
| Age | 35 days | 345 days |
| Net assets | $27m | $19m |
ACSP in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 18, 2026, ACSP paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 3.8%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 2.1 pts.
DRKY in plain words
Over the period since launch on Oct 8, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026, DRKY paid 14.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 8.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +24.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +14.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 9.7 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 14.8%, paid monthly.
Questions people ask
- Which is cheaper, ACSP or DRKY?
- ACSP charges 0.72% a year and DRKY charges 0.95%, so ACSP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACSP against DRKY, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-drky Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.