Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
ACSP vs JULH: Dividend Yield & Total Return
ACSP and JULH both write options for income.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACSP and JULH
Net assets on Nov 4, 2026: $57m for ProShares S&P 500 Autocallable Income ETF and $18m for Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July.
5.8 pts behind SPY
ACSP since launch: paid 10.4%, price −16.9%, total −6.8%, SPY −1.0%, −5.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
−1.0%
ACSP
−6.8%
5.8 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
5.8 pts behind SPY
ACSP since launch: paid 10.4%, price −16.9%, total −6.8%, SPY −1.0%, −5.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
−1.0%
ACSP
−6.8%
5.8 pts behind SPY
10.4% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACSP since launch: paid 10.4%, price −16.9%, total −6.8%, SPY −1.0%, −5.8 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.9.9 pts behind SPY
JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
JULH
+4.9%
4.8% as cash
9.9 pts behind SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
9.9 pts behind SPY
JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
SPY
+14.8%
JULH
+4.9%
9.9 pts behind SPY
4.8% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, with zero at the line. JULH over 1 year: paid 4.8%, price 0.0%, total +4.9%, SPY +14.8%, −9.9 pts. Data to Nov 4, 2026.
Data to Nov 4, 2026.Pair scorecard
ACSP costs 0.07 points a year less; ACSP is 3.2 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | ACSP | JULH |
|---|---|---|
| Paid and earned | ||
| Total return, 1 year | not published | +4.9% |
| Price change | fell 16.9% (since Aug 14, 2026) | fell 0.0% (1 year) |
| Return of capital, issuer estimate | 98% of the Nov 6, 2026 payment | 51% of the Oct 2, 2026 payment |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| Benchmark | S&P 500, measured through SPY | S&P 500, measured through SPY |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.72% | 0.79% |
| Net assets | $57m | $18m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACSP and JULH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ. Cash paid: distributions over the window, as a share of the starting price. Payout rate: the latest payment, annualized, over today’s price.
Window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACSP | JULH | ACSP | JULH | ACSP | JULH |
| 3 months | – | +1.4% | – | 1.6% | – | +1.5 pts |
| 6 months | – | +3.2% | – | 2.7% | – | −1.8 pts |
| 1 year | – | +4.9% | – | 4.8% | – | −9.9 pts |
| 3 years | – | +20.9% | – | 18.4% | – | −62.0 pts |
| Since launchNot the same days: ACSP Aug 2026 · JULH Jul 2023 | −6.8% | +23.7% | 10.4% | 20.3% | −5.8 pts | −56.1 pts |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
ACSP
Over the period from its first trade on Aug 14, 2026 to Nov 4, 2026, ACSP paid 10.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 16.9%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −6.8%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned −1.0% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 5.8 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 17.5%, paid periodically. ProShares estimates that 98% of the distribution paid Nov 6, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice). That is a tax label, not a measure of erosion.
JULH
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, JULH paid 4.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.0%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.9%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +14.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 9.9 pts. At its price on Nov 4, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.5%, paid quarterly. Innovator estimates that 51% of the distribution paid Oct 2, 2026 was a return of capital (its 19a-1 notice).
Questions people ask
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACSP against JULH, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-julh
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). ACSP against JULH. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-julh
[ACSP against JULH (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acsp-vs-julh)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.