Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

JULH vs XRMI: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year XRMI paid 12.1% of its price in cash against JULH’s 4.7%, and returned more with it reinvested.

Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July and Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF.

4.7%JULH cash paid, 1 year
12.1%XRMI cash paid, 1 year
+4.5%JULH total return, 1 year
+10.3%XRMI total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: XRMI scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

JULH 35.9XRMI 43.43.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

JULH12.1 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%JULH+4.5%4.7% as cash12.1 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%JULH+4.5%12.1 pts behind SPY
XRMI6.3 pts behind SPY · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
SPY+16.6%XRMI+10.3%12.1% of it arrived as cash6.3 pts behind SPYTotal return, distributions reinvestedSPY+16.6%XRMI+10.3%12.1% cash6.3 pts behind SPY

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, JULH and XRMI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Only in each
Only in JULHOnly in XRMI
TREASURY BILL 100.00%NVIDIA CORP 8.27%
APPLE INC 7.54%
MICROSOFT CORP 5.63%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.82%
ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.15%
BROADCOM INC 2.61%
ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.50%
META PLATFORMS INC 2.26%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.

Performance, window by window

JULH and XRMI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
JULHXRMIJULHXRMIJULHXRMI
3 months+1.8%+3.5%1.1%3.0%−0.4 pts+1.2 pts
6 months+4.0%+8.9%2.7%6.3%−14.0 pts−9.1 pts
1 year+4.5%+10.3%4.7%12.1%−12.1 pts−6.3 pts
3 years+20.7%+27.2%18.4%33.3%−57.7 pts−51.2 pts
Since launch+22.7%+17.0%18.6%43.8%−55.9 pts−66.1 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
JULH and XRMI on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
JULH
Innovator Premium Income 20 Barrier ETF - July
Defined income on SPY, paying quarterly
XRMI
Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF
Option income on SPY, paying monthly
IssuerInnovatorGlobal X
Strategydefined incomeoption income
BenchmarkS&P 500 (SPY)S&P 500 (SPY)
Paysquarterlymonthly
Payout rate, annualized4.2%12.3%
Expense ratio0.79%0.60%
Cash paid, 1 year4.7%12.1%
Price change, 1 year−0.4%−2.4%
Total return, 1 year+4.5%+10.3%
Benchmark return, 1 year+16.6%+16.6%
Ahead or behind−12.1 pts−6.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimatenot published95%
Age1173 days1849 days
Net assets$17m$60m

JULH in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.5%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 12.1 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 4.2%, paid quarterly.

XRMI in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XRMI paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.3%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, JULH or XRMI?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, JULH paid 4.7% of its starting price in cash and XRMI paid 12.1%, so XRMI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, JULH or XRMI?
With every distribution reinvested, JULH returned +4.5% and XRMI returned +10.3% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so XRMI returned more.
Which is cheaper, JULH or XRMI?
JULH charges 0.79% a year and XRMI charges 0.60%, so XRMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

JULH against XRMI, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, JULH against XRMI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/julh-vs-xrmi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources