Data as of .
SCLZ vs XRMI: which paid, and which earned it?
Over the year XRMI paid 12.1% of its price in cash against SCLZ’s 8.4%, though SCLZ returned more with it reinvested.
ETFIQ Return Stability Score: SCLZ scores higher
Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?
A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCLZ and XRMI hold 36% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | SCLZ | XRMI |
|---|---|---|
| APPLE INC | 6.15% | 7.54% |
| NVIDIA CORP | 5.99% | 8.27% |
| AMAZON.COM INC | 3.75% | 3.82% |
| MICROSOFT CORP | 3.71% | 5.63% |
| BROADCOM INC | 4.71% | 2.61% |
| META PLATFORMS INC | 3.34% | 2.26% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 7.89% | 1.76% |
| TESLA INC | 1.80% | 1.58% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 2.41% | 1.00% |
| ABBVIE INC | 1.82% | 0.72% |
| WALMART INC | 1.48% | 0.72% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS INC | 3.01% | 0.66% |
| Only in SCLZ | Only in XRMI |
|---|---|
| ALPHABET INC 5.18% | ALPHABET INC-CL A 3.15% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC 5.14% | ALPHABET INC-CL C 2.50% |
| ELI LILLY & COMPANY 3.86% | BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC-CL B 1.46% |
| JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY 3.50% | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.44% |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 3.10% | ELI LILLY & CO 1.42% |
| VISA INC 2.27% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.40% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORP 1.92% | CASH 1.11% |
| MASTERCARD INC 1.74% | EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.04% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCLZ | XRMI | SCLZ | XRMI | SCLZ | XRMI | |
| 3 months | +2.9% | +3.5% | 2.1% | 3.0% | −3.6 pts | +1.2 pts |
| 6 months | +14.2% | +8.9% | 3.8% | 6.3% | +1.6 pts | −9.1 pts |
| 1 year | +13.2% | +10.3% | 8.4% | 12.1% | −14.0 pts | −6.3 pts |
| 3 years | not published | +27.2% | not published | 33.3% | not published | −51.2 pts |
| Since launch | +36.5% | +17.0% | 19.6% | 43.8% | −6.3 pts | −66.1 pts |
| SCLZ Swan Enhanced Dividend Income ETF Dividend stocks with call overlay on SCHD, paying monthly | XRMI Global X S&P 500 Risk Managed Income ETF Option income on SPY, paying monthly | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Swan | Global X |
| Strategy | dividend stocks with call overlay | option income |
| Benchmark | US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy | S&P 500 (SPY) |
| Pays | monthly | monthly |
| Payout rate, annualized | 8.5% | 12.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.60% |
| Cash paid, 1 year | 8.4% | 12.1% |
| Price change, 1 year | +4.1% | −2.4% |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.2% | +10.3% |
| Benchmark return, 1 year | +27.2% | +16.6% |
| Ahead or behind | −14.0 pts | −6.3 pts |
| Return of capital, latest estimate | not published | 95% |
| Age | 934 days | 1849 days |
| Net assets | $20m | $60m |
SCLZ in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 4.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +13.2%. US dividend stocks (SCHD), used as the dividend proxy returned +27.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 14.0 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 8.5%, paid monthly.
XRMI in plain words
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, XRMI paid 12.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +10.3%. S&P 500 (SPY) returned +16.6% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 6.2 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 12.3%, paid monthly. Global X estimates that 95% of the distribution paid Aug 27, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
- Which paid more, SCLZ or XRMI?
- Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, SCLZ paid 8.4% of its starting price in cash and XRMI paid 12.1%, so XRMI paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
- Which returned more once distributions are counted, SCLZ or XRMI?
- With every distribution reinvested, SCLZ returned +13.2% and XRMI returned +10.3% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so SCLZ returned more.
- Which is cheaper, SCLZ or XRMI?
- SCLZ charges 0.79% a year and XRMI charges 0.60%, so XRMI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SCLZ against XRMI, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/sclz-vs-xrmi Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.