ACYS vs MRA: which paid, and which earned it?

ACYS and MRA both write options for income. FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF and GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF.

1.9%
ACYS cash paid, since launch
13.7%
MRA cash paid, since launch
+4.4%
ACYS total return, since launch
+4.6%
MRA total return, since launch
ACYS · since launch to Sep 30, 20263.8 pts behind SPY
ACYS
+4.4%
SPY
+8.2%

3.8 pts behind SPY

ACYS since launch: paid 1.9%, price +2.4%, total +4.4%, SPY +8.2%, −3.8 pts.

SPY

+8.2%

ACYS

+4.4%

3.8 pts behind SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

3.8 pts behind SPY

ACYS since launch: paid 1.9%, price +2.4%, total +4.4%, SPY +8.2%, −3.8 pts.

SPY

+8.2%

ACYS

+4.4%

3.8 pts behind SPY

1.9% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACYS since launch: paid 1.9%, price +2.4%, total +4.4%, SPY +8.2%, −3.8 pts.

MRA · since launch to Sep 30, 202625.5 pts ahead of MARA
MRA
+4.6%
MARA
−20.9%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MARA

−20.9%

MRA

+4.6%

13.7% cash

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

Total return, distributions reinvested

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

MARA

−20.9%

MRA

+4.6%

25.5 pts ahead of MARA

13.7% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +8.2%. MRA since launch: paid 13.7%, price −10.4%, total +4.6%, MARA −20.9%, +25.5 pts.

Performance, window by window

Total returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
WindowACYSMRAACYSMRAACYSMRA
3 months+2.4%+7.2%1.3%7.5%−0.1 pts+22.4 pts
Since launch
ACYS Apr 2026 · MRA May 2026
+4.4%+4.6%1.9%13.7%−3.8 pts+25.5 pts

ACYS and MRA over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACYS
FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY, paying monthly
MRA
GraniteShares Autocallable MARA ETF · Autocallable on MARA, paying monthly
Issuer First Trust GraniteShares
Strategy autocallable autocallable
Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy MARA (MARA)
Pays monthly monthly
Payout rate, annualized 7.7% 45.3%
Expense ratio 0.75% 1.07%
Cash paid, 1 year 1.9% (since launch on Apr 23, 2026) 13.7% (since launch on May 27, 2026)
Price change, 1 year +2.4% −10.4%
Total return, 1 year +4.4% (since launch on Apr 23, 2026) +4.6% (since launch on May 27, 2026)
Benchmark return, 1 year +8.2% −20.9%
Ahead or behind −3.8 pts +25.5 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published
Age 160 days 126 days
Net assets $502m $1m

ACYS and MRA on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACYS in plain words

Over the period since launch on Apr 23, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACYS paid 1.9% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 2.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.4%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +8.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 3.8 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 7.7%, paid monthly.

MRA in plain words

Over the period since launch on May 27, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, MRA paid 13.7% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 10.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +4.6%. MARA (MARA) returned −20.9% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 25.5 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 45.3%, paid monthly.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACYS or MRA?
ACYS charges 0.75% a year and MRA charges 1.07%, so ACYS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACYS against MRA, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acys-vs-mra

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.