Which is cheaper, ACBH or IACL?

ACBH charges 0.60% a year and IACL charges 0.55%, so IACL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

ACBH vs IACL: which paid, and which earned it?

ACBH and IACL both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF.

0.8%

ACBH cash paid, since launch

0.4%

IACL cash paid, since launch

+1.3%

ACBH total return, since launch

+1.1%

IACL total return, since launch

ACBH · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY

ACBH

+1.3%

SPY

+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

0.8% of it arrived as cash

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

0.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

IACL · since launch to Sep 30, 20261.4 pts ahead of SPY

IACL

+1.1%

SPY

−0.4%

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.

SPY

−0.4%

IACL

+1.1%

0.4% as cash

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.

SPY

−0.4%

IACL

+1.1%

1.4 pts ahead of SPY

0.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +1.3%. IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ACBH	IACL	ACBH	IACL	ACBH	IACL
Since launch ACBH Sep 2026 · IACL Aug 2026	+1.3%	+1.1%	0.8%	0.4%	+0.4 pts	+1.4 pts

ACBH and IACL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACBH

Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY

IACL

GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY

Issuer Pacer GraniteShares

Strategy autocallable autocallable

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy

Pays not established not established

Payout rate, annualized 10.1% 5.0%

Expense ratio 0.60% 0.55%

Cash paid, 1 year 0.8% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 0.4% (since launch on Aug 18, 2026)

Price change, 1 year +0.4% +0.7%

Total return, 1 year +1.3% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) +1.1% (since launch on Aug 18, 2026)

Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% −0.4%

Ahead or behind +0.4 pts +1.4 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published 99%

Age 20 days 43 days

Net assets $3m $3m

ACBH and IACL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACBH in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.

IACL in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 18, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, IACL paid 0.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned −0.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.0%, paid periodically. GraniteShares estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBH or IACL?: ACBH charges 0.60% a year and IACL charges 0.55%, so IACL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ACBH vs DACL ACBH vs JANQ ACBH vs JULH ACBH vs JULJ IACL vs APRH IACL vs APRJ IACL vs CAIQ IACL vs JANH

S&P 500 (SPY) →ACBH on its own →IACL on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ACBH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACBH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Pacer website ↗IACL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IACL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗IACL 19a-1 distribution notice ↗GraniteShares page for IACL ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACBH against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-iacl

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.