Which is cheaper, ACBH or DACL?

ACBH charges 0.60% a year and DACL charges 0.65%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

ACBH vs DACL: which paid, and which earned it?

ACBH and DACL both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF and REX Defensive Autocallable Income ETF.

0.8%

ACBH cash paid, since launch

0.6%

DACL cash paid, since launch

+1.3%

ACBH total return, since launch

+0.5%

DACL total return, since launch

ACBH · since launch to Sep 30, 2026About even with SPY

ACBH

+1.3%

SPY

+0.9%

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

0.8% as cash

about even with SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

About even with SPY

ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

SPY

+0.9%

ACBH

+1.3%

about even with SPY

0.8% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBH since launch: paid 0.8%, price +0.4%, total +1.3%, SPY +0.9%, +0.4 pts.

DACL · since launch to Sep 30, 20262.2 pts ahead of SPY

DACL

+0.5%

SPY

−1.7%

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

DACL since launch: paid 0.6%, price −0.1%, total +0.5%, SPY −1.7%, +2.2 pts.

SPY

−1.7%

DACL

+0.5%

0.6% cash

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

Total return, distributions reinvested

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

DACL since launch: paid 0.6%, price −0.1%, total +0.5%, SPY −1.7%, +2.2 pts.

SPY

−1.7%

DACL

+0.5%

2.2 pts ahead of SPY

0.6% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +1.3%. DACL since launch: paid 0.6%, price −0.1%, total +0.5%, SPY −1.7%, +2.2 pts.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Cash paid		Against the benchmark
Window	ACBH	DACL	ACBH	DACL	ACBH	DACL
Since launch ACBH Sep 2026 · DACL Aug 2026	+1.3%	+0.5%	0.8%	0.6%	+0.4 pts	+2.2 pts

ACBH and DACL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

ACBH

Pacer Metaurus High Income Autocallable ETF · Autocallable on SPY

DACL

REX Defensive Autocallable Income ETF · Autocallable on SPY

Issuer Pacer REX

Strategy autocallable autocallable

Benchmark S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy

Pays not established not established

Payout rate, annualized 10.1% 6.6%

Expense ratio 0.60% 0.65%

Cash paid, 1 year 0.8% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) 0.6% (since launch on Aug 13, 2026)

Price change, 1 year +0.4% −0.1%

Total return, 1 year +1.3% (since launch on Sep 10, 2026) +0.5% (since launch on Aug 13, 2026)

Benchmark return, 1 year +0.9% −1.7%

Ahead or behind +0.4 pts +2.2 pts

Return of capital, latest estimate not published not published

Age 20 days 48 days

Net assets $3m $4m

ACBH and DACL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACBH in plain words

Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBH paid 0.8% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.4%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.3%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 10.1%, paid periodically.

DACL in plain words

Over the period since launch on Aug 13, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, DACL paid 0.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.5%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned −1.7% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 2.2 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.6%, paid periodically.

Questions people ask

Which is cheaper, ACBH or DACL?: ACBH charges 0.60% a year and DACL charges 0.65%, so ACBH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

ACBH vs ATC ACBH vs ATCL ACBH vs CAGE ACBH vs CAIE DACL vs IACL DACL vs JANH DACL vs JANJ DACL vs JANQ

S&P 500 (SPY) →ACBH on its own →DACL on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ACBH filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACBH prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Pacer website ↗DACL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗DACL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗REX page for DACL ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, ACBH against DACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbh-vs-dacl

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.