ACBE vs ACRT: which paid, and which earned it?
ACBE and ACRT both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF and ProShares Russell 2000 Autocallable Income ETF.
About even with SPY
ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.
SPY
+0.9%
ACBE
+0.7%
about even with SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with SPY
ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.
SPY
+0.9%
ACBE
+0.7%
about even with SPY
0.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with IWM
ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
IWM
−8.7%
ACRT
−8.7%
about even with IWM
0.0% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +0.9%. ACRT since launch: paid 0.0%, price −8.7%, total −8.7%, IWM −8.7%, 0.0 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACBE | ACRT | ACBE | ACRT | ACBE | ACRT |
| Since launch ACBE Sep 2026 · ACRT Aug 2026 | +0.7% | −8.7% | 0.6% | 0.0% | −0.2 pts | 0.0 pts |
ACBE and ACRT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACBE and ACRT on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACBE in plain words
Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBE paid 0.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.7%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.9%, paid periodically.
ACRT in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 14, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACRT paid 0.0% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 8.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −8.7%. Russell 2000 (IWM) returned −8.7% over the same days, so a holder was about even.
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACBE against ACRT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-acrt
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACBE against ACRT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-acrt Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACBE against ACRT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-acrt
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACBE against ACRT. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-acrt
- Markdown
- [ACBE against ACRT (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-acrt)