ACBE vs IACL: which paid, and which earned it?
ACBE and IACL both write options for income. Pacer Metaurus Enhanced Core Income Autocallable ETF and GraniteShares US 100 Autocallable Income ETF.
About even with SPY
ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.
SPY
+0.9%
ACBE
+0.7%
0.6% of it arrived as cash
about even with SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
About even with SPY
ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.
SPY
+0.9%
ACBE
+0.7%
about even with SPY
0.6% of it arrived as cash. Total return, distributions reinvested. ACBE since launch: paid 0.6%, price +0.1%, total +0.7%, SPY +0.9%, −0.2 pts.
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.
SPY
−0.4%
IACL
+1.1%
0.4% as cash
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
Total return, distributions reinvested
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.
SPY
−0.4%
IACL
+1.1%
1.4 pts ahead of SPY
0.4% of it arrived as cash. Both charts share one scale, 0 to +1.1%. IACL since launch: paid 0.4%, price +0.7%, total +1.1%, SPY −0.4%, +1.4 pts.
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Cash paid | Against the benchmark | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | ACBE | IACL | ACBE | IACL | ACBE | IACL |
| Since launch ACBE Sep 2026 · IACL Aug 2026 | +0.7% | +1.1% | 0.6% | 0.4% | −0.2 pts | +1.4 pts |
ACBE and IACL over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
ACBE and IACL on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACBE in plain words
Over the period since launch on Sep 10, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, ACBE paid 0.6% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +0.7%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned +0.9% over the same days, so a holder was about even. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 6.9%, paid periodically.
IACL in plain words
Over the period since launch on Aug 18, 2026 to Sep 30, 2026, IACL paid 0.4% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price rose 0.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +1.1%. S&P 500 (SPY), used as a default proxy returned −0.4% over the same days, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. At its price on Sep 30, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 5.0%, paid periodically. GraniteShares estimates that 99% of the distribution paid Sep 11, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).
Questions people ask
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, ACBE against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-iacl
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, ACBE against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-iacl Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, ACBE against IACL, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-iacl
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). ACBE against IACL. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-iacl
- Markdown
- [ACBE against IACL (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/income/acbe-vs-iacl)