IWV vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWV and XLG hold 57% of their weight in the same names, and IWV returned +16.7% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $20.6bn for iShares Russell 3000 ETF and $12.0bn for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

Both cost 0.20% a year; their one-year returns differ by 4.6 points; IWV is 1.7 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

IWV vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWVXLG
Expense ratio0.20%0.20%
Net assets$20.6bn$12.0bn
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+12.1%
What it tracksRussell 3000 IndexS&P 500 Top 50 Index
Holdings in common57%
Holdings datedOct 9, 2026Oct 10, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund34.7%61.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+16.7%
IWV total return, 1 year
+12.1%
XLG total return, 1 year
0.20%
IWV expense ratio
0.20%
XLG expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWV and XLG hold 57% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

57% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWV XLG
NVIDIA 7.15% 12.88%
APPLE 6.51% 11.40%
MICROSOFT 5.32% 9.22%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.40% 5.98%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.74% 4.79%
BROADCOM INC 2.25% 3.99%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.21% 3.84%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.11% 3.68%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.55% 2.70%
TESLA INC 1.49% 2.50%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.32% 2.30%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.28% 2.23%
Only in IWV
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 0.45%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 0.37%
RTX 0.34%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INC 0.33%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY 0.32%
AMGEN INC 0.30%
ARISTA NETWORKS 0.30%
AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 0.29%
Only in XLG
Invesco Government & Agency Portfolio 0.02%
SECURITIES LENDING - BNYM 0.00%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks the S&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year +16.7% +12.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VTHR) not published
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTHR not available
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 98.4%
Holdings 2600 53
Net assets $20.6bn $12.0bn

IWV and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,600 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.

About XLG

XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 61.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWV or XLG?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWV returned +16.7% and XLG +12.1%.
Which is cheaper, IWV or XLG?
Neither: IWV and XLG both charge 0.20% a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWV and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of IWV and 98% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWV against XLG, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwv-vs-xlg

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.