FDLO vs IWV: Differences, Returns & Fees

FDLO and IWV hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and IWV returned +16.7% over the year. Net assets: $1.4bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF, and $20.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 3000 ETF.

FDLO costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.6 points; IWV is 14.7 times larger.

FDLO vs IWV: Differences, Returns & Fees
FDLOIWV
Expense ratio0.15%0.20%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$1.4bn$20.3bn
Total return, 1 year+12.1%+16.7%
What it tracksFidelity U.S. Low Volatility Factor IndexRussell 3000 Index
Holdings in common34%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund38.5%34.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+12.1%
FDLO total return, 1 year
+16.7%
IWV total return, 1 year
0.15%
FDLO expense ratio
0.20%
IWV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, FDLO and IWV hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

34% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding FDLO IWV
APPLE INC 7.98% 6.51%
MICROSOFT CORP 6.33% 5.32%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.48% 3.40%
ALPHABET INC 6.20% 2.74%
BROADCOM INC 4.08% 2.25%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.13% 0.93%
VISA INC 1.37% 0.87%
ABBVIE INC 1.16% 0.65%
WALMART INC 0.89% 0.65%
MASTERCARD INC 1.12% 0.64%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 2.20% 0.63%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.07% 0.47%
Only in FDLO
JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 1.87%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC DEL 1.81%
ELI LILLY and CO 1.80%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC. 1.69%
AMPHENOL CORPORATION NEW 1.61%
JOHNSON and JOHNSON 1.39%
IBM CORPORATION 1.13%
MERCK and CO INC 0.95%
Only in IWV
NVIDIA 7.15%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.21%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.11%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.55%
TESLA INC 1.49%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.32%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.28%
ELI LILLY 1.26%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

FDLO
Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF
IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +12.1% +16.7%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +16.8% (VTHR)
Gap to its benchmark not available −0.1 pts vs VTHR
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 96.3% 87.8%
Holdings 123 2600
Net assets, FDLO as of Sep 30, 2026 and IWV as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.4bn $20.6bn

FDLO and IWV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About FDLO

FDLO tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 123 positions, with the top ten at 38.5%.

About IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,600 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, FDLO or IWV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDLO returned +12.1% and IWV +16.7%.
Which is cheaper, FDLO or IWV?
FDLO is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do FDLO and IWV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 96% of FDLO and 88% of IWV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FDLO against IWV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdlo-vs-iwv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.