A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

IWV vs LCTU: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWV and LCTU hold 69% of their weight in the same names, and IWV returned +16.7% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $20.6bn for iShares Russell 3000 ETF and $1.2bn for iShares U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness Aware Active ETF.

LCTU costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.4 points; IWV is 17.2 times larger.

IWV vs LCTU: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWVLCTU
Expense ratio0.20%0.15%
Net assets$20.6bn$1.2bn
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+15.3%
What it tracksRussell 3000 IndexNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common69%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund34.7%35.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+16.7%
IWV total return, 1 year
+15.3%
LCTU total return, 1 year
0.20%
IWV expense ratio
0.15%
LCTU expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWV and LCTU hold 69% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

69% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWV LCTU
NVIDIA 7.15% 7.91%
APPLE 6.51% 7.14%
MICROSOFT 5.32% 5.12%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.40% 3.18%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.74% 2.48%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.11% 2.30%
BROADCOM INC 2.25% 2.05%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.21% 1.90%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.55% 1.60%
TESLA INC 1.49% 1.49%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.32% 1.55%
ELI LILLY 1.26% 1.33%
Only in IWV
PROCTER & GAMBLE 0.47%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL 0.42%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT INC 0.35%
LINDE PLC 0.30%
AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 0.29%
BLACKROCK 0.22%
MCDONALDS CORP 0.22%
UNION PACIFIC 0.22%
Only in LCTU
GAMESTOP EQUITY WARRANT EXPIRY TH 0.00%
WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE INC 0.00%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
LCTU
iShares U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness Aware Active ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares iShares
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +16.7% +15.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VTHR) +16.6% (IWB)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTHR −1.4 pts vs IWB
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.15%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 93.4%
Holdings 2600 322
Net assets $20.6bn $1.2bn

IWV and LCTU on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,600 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.

About LCTU

LCTU is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 322 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested, against +16.6% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWV or LCTU?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWV returned +16.7% and LCTU +15.3%.
Which is cheaper, IWV or LCTU?
LCTU is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWV and LCTU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of IWV and 93% of LCTU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
IWV vs STXFIWV vs IYZIWV vs TSPAIWV vs OMFLLCTU vs OEFLCTU vs SPMODFUS vs LCTULCTU vs MTUM
IWV on its own →LCTU on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
IWV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IWV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IWV ↗LCTU filings on SEC EDGAR ↗LCTU prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for LCTU ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWV against LCTU, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwv-vs-lctu

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.