Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 13, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

SPMO vs XLG: how they differ

SPMO and XLG hold 40% of their weight in the same names, and SPMO returned more over the year.

Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, SPMO and XLG hold 40% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions SPMO and XLG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingSPMOXLG
NVIDIA Corp8.93%12.79%
Alphabet Inc4.29%4.71%
Broadcom Inc6.24%4.12%
Alphabet Inc3.42%3.77%
Micron Technology Inc11.01%2.66%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc4.12%1.99%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp3.22%1.65%
Johnson & Johnson4.64%1.55%
Intel Corp2.63%1.20%
Cisco Systems Inc1.84%1.02%
Palantir Technologies Inc1.50%0.92%
Lam Research Corp3.38%0.90%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in SPMOOnly in XLG
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 1.88%Apple Inc 11.58%
RTX Corp 1.57%Microsoft Corp 8.83%
Western Digital Corp 1.56%Amazon.com Inc 5.95%
Amphenol Corp 1.43%Meta Platforms Inc 3.42%
Newmont Corp 1.29%Tesla Inc 2.47%
Citigroup Inc 1.09%JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.29%
Gilead Sciences Inc 0.91%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.25%
Welltower Inc 0.89%Eli Lilly & Co 2.15%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026.

SPMO and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 13, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerInvescoInvesco
What it isS&P 500 MomentumS&P 500 top 50
Total return, 1 year+24.5%+12.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500+7.0 pts−5.3 pts
Expense ratio0.13%0.20%
Already in the S&P 500100.0%100.0%
Holdings10152

SPMO in plain words

SPMO is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +24.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.13% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 51.9%. It sat 8.3% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

XLG in plain words

XLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings filed for Sep 10, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, SPMO or XLG?
In the year to Sep 13, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SPMO returned +24.5% and XLG returned +12.2%, so SPMO returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, SPMO or XLG?
SPMO charges 0.13% a year and XLG charges 0.20%, so SPMO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do SPMO and XLG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of SPMO and 100% of XLG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 40% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

SPMO against XLG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 13, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPMO against XLG, data as of Sep 13, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/spmo-vs-xlg Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources