Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
ACWX vs XLG: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ACWX returned +14.3% to XLG's +6.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about ACWX and XLG
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $17.9bn for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and $11.9bn for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF.
Pair scorecard
XLG costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.9 points; ACWX is 1.5 times larger.
| Measure | ACWX | XLG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.3% | +6.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its high | 4.9%, high on Sep 4, 2026 | |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | MSCI ACWI ex USA Index | S&P 500 Top 50 Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.20% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $17.9bn | $11.9bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 15.6% | 60.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and XLG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
ACWX and XLG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
ACWX
ACWX tracks the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,939 positions, with the top ten at 15.6%. It sat 4.9% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.
XLG
XLG tracks the S&P 500 top 50. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.4% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 60.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or XLG?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +14.3% and XLG +6.4%.
- Which is cheaper, ACWX or XLG?
- XLG is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, ACWX against XLG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-xlg
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). ACWX against XLG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-xlg
[ACWX against XLG (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-xlg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.