Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
IWB vs XLSR: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, IWB returned +14.5% to XLSR's +9.5%; 21% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IWB and XLSRNet assets: $48.5bn on Nov 4, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $1.1bn on Nov 3, 2026 for State Street US Sector Rotation ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWB costs 0.55 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.0 points; IWB is far larger, $47.8bn against $1.1bn.
| Measure | IWB | XLSR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +14.5% | +9.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Index | No index, actively managed |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.70% |
| Net assets, as of Nov 3, 2026 | $47.8bn | $1.1bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 21% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 34.5% | 90.9% |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IWB and XLSR hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Nov 3, 2026.
half
21% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IWB and XLSR on the fields both publish, as of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
IWB
IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +14.5% with distributions reinvested, against +14.6% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,024 positions, with the top ten at 34.5%.
XLSR
XLSR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 it returned +9.5% with distributions reinvested, against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.70% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026, 34% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 21 positions, with the top ten at 90.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWB or XLSR?
- In the year to Nov 4, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +14.5% and XLSR +9.5%.
- Which is cheaper, IWB or XLSR?
- IWB is cheaper, by 0.55 percentage points a year. That is about $55 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWB against XLSR, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-xlsr
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). IWB against XLSR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-xlsr
[IWB against XLSR (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-xlsr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.