A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

IWB vs MODL: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWB and MODL hold 64% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned +16.6% over the year. Net assets: $49.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF.

IWB costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.3 points; IWB is far larger, $48.3bn against $1.0bn.

IWB vs MODL: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWBMODL
Expense ratio0.15%0.46%
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026$48.3bn$1.0bn
Total return, 1 year+16.6%+15.3%
What it tracksRussell 1000 IndexNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common64%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund36.1%32.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+16.6%
IWB total return, 1 year
+15.3%
MODL total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWB expense ratio
0.46%
MODL expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and MODL hold 64% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

64% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWB MODL
NVIDIA 7.44% 6.04%
APPLE 6.77% 5.48%
MICROSOFT 5.53% 3.52%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.85% 3.36%
BROADCOM INC 2.34% 2.31%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.30% 2.90%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.20% 1.97%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.54% 1.96%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.61% 1.69%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.34% 1.73%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.24% 2.16%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.38% 1.22%
Only in IWB
ELI LILLY 1.31%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.97%
WALMART 0.68%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 0.58%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 0.56%
CHEVRON 0.55%
CATERPILLAR INC 0.51%
PROCTER & GAMBLE 0.49%
Only in MODL
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 2.21%
LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 1.05%
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 0.74%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 0.58%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED 0.35%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.27%
U.S. BANCORP 0.23%
MEDTRONIC PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.21%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
MODL
VictoryShares WestEnd U.S. Sector ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares VictoryShares
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +16.6% +15.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VONE) not published
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VONE not available
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.46%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 95.6%
Holdings 1025 363
Net assets, IWB as of Oct 9, 2026 and MODL as of Jun 30, 2026 $49.6bn $1.0bn

IWB and MODL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.

About MODL

MODL is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 363 positions, with the top ten at 32.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or MODL?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.6% and MODL +15.3%.
Which is cheaper, IWB or MODL?
IWB is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and MODL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 96% of MODL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
IWB vs IYZIWB vs LCTUIWB vs LRGCIWB vs SEIMMODL vs QUALMODL vs SCHBMODL vs RDVYMODL vs USMV
IWB on its own →MODL on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
IWB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IWB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IWB ↗MODL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗MODL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWB against MODL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-modl

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.