Which returned more over the last year, IWB or LRGF?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.6% and LRGF +16.5%.

Which is cheaper, IWB or LRGF?

LRGF is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do IWB and LRGF overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 89% of LRGF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Share on X Download as PDF

Compare their flows Ask IQ about these two funds

IWB vs LRGF: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWB and LRGF hold 68% of their weight in the same names. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $49.6bn for iShares Russell 1000 ETF and $3.8bn for iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF.

LRGF costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.1 points; IWB is 13.2 times larger.

IWB vs LRGF: Differences, Returns & Fees
	IWB	LRGF
Expense ratio	0.15%	0.08%
Net assets	$49.6bn	$3.8bn
Total return, 1 year	+16.6%	+16.5%
What it tracks	Russell 1000 Index	STOXX U.S. Equity Factor Index
Holdings in common	68%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	36.1%	35.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+16.6%

IWB total return, 1 year

+16.5%

LRGF total return, 1 year

0.15%

IWB expense ratio

0.08%

LRGF expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and LRGF hold 68% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

50%

half

68% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding IWB LRGF

NVIDIA 7.44% 7.58%

APPLE 6.77% 6.76%

MICROSOFT 5.53% 5.35%

AMAZON.COM INC 3.54% 3.21%

BROADCOM INC 2.34% 2.58%

ALPHABET CLASS C 2.30% 3.93%

META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.20% 2.08%

MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.61% 1.43%

JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.24% 1.44%

TESLA INC 1.56% 1.18%

ELI LILLY 1.31% 1.17%

ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.38% 1.13%

Only in IWB

HOME DEPOT 0.40%

TEXAS INSTRUMENT INC 0.36%

CONOCOPHILLIPS 0.23%

UNION PACIFIC 0.23%

WELLTOWER 0.23%

CHARLES SCHWAB 0.22%

DEERE 0.21%

INTUITIVE SURGICAL 0.21%

Only in LRGF

AERCAP HOLDINGS 0.57%

SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.37%

OSCAR HEALTH CLASS A 0.26%

TE CONNECTIVITY PLC 0.24%

INTERDIGITAL INC 0.15%

PTC THERAPEUTICS 0.15%

ARGAN 0.14%

STONEX GROUP INC 0.14%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWB

iShares Russell 1000 ETF

LRGF

iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer iShares iShares

What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year +16.6% +16.5%

Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VONE) not published

Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VONE not available

Expense ratio 0.15% 0.08%

Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 88.8%

Holdings 1025 302

Net assets $49.6bn $3.8bn

IWB and LRGF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.

About LRGF

LRGF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.5% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 302 positions, with the top ten at 35.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or LRGF?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.6% and LRGF +16.5%.
Which is cheaper, IWB or LRGF?: LRGF is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and LRGF overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 89% of LRGF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

IWB vs USCA IWB vs MSLC IWB vs SUSA IWB vs QLTY LRGF vs QUAL LRGF vs SCHB LRGF vs RDVY LRGF vs USMV

IWB on its own →LRGF on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

IWB and LRGF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IWB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IWB ↗LRGF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for LRGF ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWB against LRGF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-lrgf

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.