IWB vs SPUS: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWB and SPUS hold 54% of their weight in the same names, and SPUS returned +21.9% over the year. Net assets: $49.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $2.7bn on May 31, 2026 for SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF.

IWB costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.3 points.

IWBSPUS
Expense ratio0.15%0.45%
Net assets, IWB as of Oct 9, 2026 and SPUS as of May 31, 2026$49.6bn$2.7bn
Total return, 1 year+16.6%+21.9%
What it tracksRussell 1000 Indexnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common54%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund36.1%57.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+16.6%
IWB total return, 1 year
+21.9%
SPUS total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWB expense ratio
0.45%
SPUS expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and SPUS hold 54% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

54% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWB SPUS
NVIDIA 7.44% 13.51%
APPLE 6.77% 12.06%
MICROSOFT 5.53% 8.80%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.85% 5.83%
BROADCOM INC 2.34% 5.58%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.61% 2.86%
TESLA INC 1.56% 3.21%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.38% 2.20%
ELI LILLY 1.31% 2.29%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.97% 1.59%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.88% 1.42%
ABBVIE 0.68% 1.01%
Only in IWB
AMAZON.COM INC 3.54%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.30%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.20%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.34%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.24%
VISA CLASS A 0.91%
WALMART 0.68%
INTEL CORPORATION 0.67%
Only in SPUS
Seagate Technology Holdings PL 0.51%
NXP Semiconductors NV 0.21%
TE Connectivity PLC 0.17%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.6% +21.9%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −0.6 pts +4.6 pts
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.45%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 99.7%
Holdings 1025 213
Net assets, IWB as of Oct 9, 2026 and SPUS as of May 31, 2026 $49.6bn $2.7bn

IWB and SPUS on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IWB in plain words

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.

SPUS in plain words

SPUS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +21.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.45% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 213 positions, with the top ten at 57.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or SPUS?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.6% and SPUS +21.9%.
Which is cheaper, IWB or SPUS?
IWB is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and SPUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 100% of SPUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWB against SPUS, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-spus

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.