A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

IWB vs SFLR: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWB and SFLR hold 64% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned +16.6% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $49.6bn for iShares Russell 1000 ETF and $2.3bn for Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF.

IWB costs 0.74 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.7 points; IWB is far larger, $49.6bn against $2.3bn.

IWB vs SFLR: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWBSFLR
Expense ratio0.15%0.89%
Net assets$49.6bn$2.3bn
Total return, 1 year+16.6%+9.9%
What it tracksRussell 1000 IndexNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common64%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund36.1%37.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+16.6%
IWB total return, 1 year
+9.9%
SFLR total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWB expense ratio
0.89%
SFLR expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and SFLR hold 64% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

64% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWB SFLR
NVIDIA 7.44% 7.35%
APPLE 6.77% 7.04%
MICROSOFT 5.53% 4.96%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.54% 4.19%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.85% 3.27%
BROADCOM INC 2.34% 2.96%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.30% 2.83%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.20% 1.78%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.61% 1.74%
TESLA INC 1.56% 1.39%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.38% 1.48%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.34% 1.32%
Only in IWB
PALO ALTO NETWORKS 0.47%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL 0.44%
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP 0.36%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT INC 0.36%
RTX 0.35%
WELLS FARGO 0.35%
ARISTA NETWORKS 0.31%
AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 0.30%
Only in SFLR
TE Connectivity PLC 0.32%
Venture Global Inc 0.12%
MercadoLibre Inc 0.11%
Amrize Ltd 0.05%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares Innovator
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +16.6% +9.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VONE) not published
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VONE not available
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.89%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 90.9%
Holdings 1025 188
Net assets $49.6bn $2.3bn

IWB and SFLR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.

About SFLR

SFLR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.89% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 188 positions, with the top ten at 37.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or SFLR?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.6% and SFLR +9.9%.
Which is cheaper, IWB or SFLR?
IWB is cheaper, by 0.74 percentage points a year. That is about $74 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and SFLR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 91% of SFLR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
IWB vs QDFIWB vs KLMNIWB vs SPUSIWB vs JMOMQUAL vs SFLRSCHB vs SFLRRDVY vs SFLRSFLR vs USMV
IWB on its own →SFLR on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
IWB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IWB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IWB ↗SFLR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SFLR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Innovator page for SFLR ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWB against SFLR, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-sflr

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.