A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

IWB vs TMFC: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWB and TMFC hold 51% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned +16.6% over the year. Net assets: $49.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 ETF, and $2.1bn on May 31, 2026 for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF.

IWB costs 0.35 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.5 points; IWB is far larger, $39.2bn against $1.3bn.

IWB vs TMFC: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWBTMFC
Expense ratio0.15%0.50%
Net assets, as of Feb 28, 2025$39.2bn$1.3bn
Total return, 1 year+16.6%+15.1%
What it tracksRussell 1000 IndexMotley Fool 100 Index
Holdings in common51%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund36.1%55.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+16.6%
IWB total return, 1 year
+15.1%
TMFC total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWB expense ratio
0.50%
TMFC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and TMFC hold 51% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

51% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWB TMFC
NVIDIA 7.44% 9.40%
APPLE 6.77% 8.29%
MICROSOFT 5.53% 6.24%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.54% 5.30%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.85% 8.66%
BROADCOM INC 2.34% 4.92%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.20% 3.79%
TESLA INC 1.56% 2.31%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.38% 3.20%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.34% 1.93%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.24% 3.03%
VISA CLASS A 0.91% 2.37%
Only in IWB
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.30%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.61%
ELI LILLY 1.31%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.97%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.88%
ABBVIE 0.68%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 0.65%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 0.65%
Only in TMFC
ALTABA INC ORD SHS ESCROW 0.00%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares Motley Fool
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.6% +15.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VONE) not published
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VONE not available
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.50%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 98.0%
Holdings 1025 101
Net assets, IWB as of Oct 9, 2026 and TMFC as of May 31, 2026 $49.6bn $2.1bn

IWB and TMFC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.

About TMFC

TMFC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 55.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or TMFC?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.6% and TMFC +15.1%.
Which is cheaper, IWB or TMFC?
IWB is cheaper, by 0.35 percentage points a year. That is about $35 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and TMFC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 98% of TMFC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
IWB vs USPXIWB vs JPEFIWB vs TILTCGCV vs IWBQUAL vs TMFCSCHB vs TMFCRDVY vs TMFCTMFC vs USMV
IWB on its own →TMFC on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
IWB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IWB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IWB ↗TMFC filings on SEC EDGAR ↗TMFC prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Motley Fool website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWB against TMFC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-tmfc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.