SCHB vs TMFC: Differences, Returns & Fees
SCHB and TMFC hold 48% of their weight in the same names, and SCHB returned +16.8% over the year. Net assets on May 31, 2026: $43.3bn for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF and $2.1bn for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF.
SCHB costs 0.47 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.7 points; SCHB is far larger, $43.3bn against $2.1bn.
| SCHB | TMFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, as of May 31, 2026 | $43.3bn | $2.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +16.8% | +15.1% |
| What it tracks | Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index | Motley Fool 100 Index |
| Holdings in common | 48% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 34.9% | 55.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCHB and TMFC hold 48% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
half
48% in common
On the same fields
SCHB and TMFC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About SCHB
SCHB tracks an index of US broad market. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,405 positions, with the top ten at 34.9%.
About TMFC
TMFC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 55.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHB or TMFC?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHB returned +16.8% and TMFC +15.1%.
- Which is cheaper, SCHB or TMFC?
- SCHB is cheaper, by 0.47 percentage points a year. That is about $47 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SCHB against TMFC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schb-vs-tmfc
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). SCHB against TMFC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schb-vs-tmfc
[SCHB against TMFC (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schb-vs-tmfc)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.