IWB vs USCA: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWB and USCA hold 80% of their weight in the same names, and IWB returned +16.6% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $49.6bn for iShares Russell 1000 ETF and $3.6bn for Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF.

USCA costs 0.08 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.7 points; IWB is 13.8 times larger.

IWB vs USCA: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWBUSCA
Expense ratio0.15%0.07%
Net assets$49.6bn$3.6bn
Total return, 1 year+16.6%+12.9%
What it tracksRussell 1000 IndexMSCI USA Climate Action Index
Holdings in common80%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund36.1%45.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+16.6%
IWB total return, 1 year
+12.9%
USCA total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWB expense ratio
0.07%
USCA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWB and USCA hold 80% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

80% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWB USCA
NVIDIA 7.44% 9.07%
APPLE 6.77% 8.52%
MICROSOFT 5.53% 5.91%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.54% 4.86%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.85% 4.12%
BROADCOM INC 2.34% 3.73%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.30% 3.24%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.20% 2.58%
TESLA INC 1.56% 2.27%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.38% 1.56%
ELI LILLY 1.31% 1.65%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.24% 1.12%
Only in IWB
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.34%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL 0.44%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 0.38%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT INC 0.36%
SANDISK 0.32%
TJX 0.21%
BOEING 0.20%
MARATHON PETROLEUM 0.19%
Only in USCA
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC 0.27%
NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 0.15%
MERCADOLIBRE INC 0.14%
TE CONNECTIVITY PLC 0.12%
ELECTRONIC ARTS INC 0.07%
WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY INC 0.06%
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES INC 0.05%
WASTE CONNECTIONS INC 0.04%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWB
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
USCA
Xtrackers MSCI USA Climate Action Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.6% +12.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VONE) not published
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VONE not available
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.07%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 97.7%
Holdings 1025 404
Net assets $49.6bn $3.6bn

IWB and USCA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWB

IWB tracks the Russell 1000. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.6% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,025 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%.

About USCA

USCA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.07% a year. By its holdings filed for May 29, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 404 positions, with the top ten at 45.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWB or USCA?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWB returned +16.6% and USCA +12.9%.
Which is cheaper, IWB or USCA?
USCA is cheaper, by 0.08 percentage points a year. That is about $8 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWB and USCA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of IWB and 98% of USCA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWB against USCA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwb-vs-usca

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.